709 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16935116)
21. Eleven-year single-center experience with the ATS Open Pivot Bileaflet heart valve.
Baykut D; Grize L; Schindler C; Keil AS; Bernet F; Zerkowski HR
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):847-52. PubMed ID: 16928496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis. A clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up.
Peter M; Weiss P; Jenzer HR; Hoffmann A; Dubach P; Roth J; Bertschmann W; Stulz P; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 106(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 8412252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
Nyawo B; Graham R; Hunter S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
Kawachi Y; Tanaka J; Tominaga R; Kinoshita K; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
Jamieson WR; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Lichtenstein SV; Fradet GJ; Janusz MT
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mid-term results after Epic xenograft implantation for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement.
Lehmann S; Walther T; Leontjev S; Kempfert J; Rastan A; Garbade J; Borger MA; Falk V; Mohr FW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):641-8; discussion 648. PubMed ID: 18095514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Safety of remote aortic valve replacement after prior coronary artery bypass grafting.
Hoff SJ; Merrill WH; Stewart JR; Bender HW
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Jun; 61(6):1689-91; discussion 1691-2. PubMed ID: 8651768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis. A preliminary report.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Santini F; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Mar; 97(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 2918737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis: a 25-year experience with single valve replacement.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Arom KV; Emery AM; Benyo-Albrecht K; Joyce LD; Nicoloff DM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 79(3):776-82; discussion 782-3. PubMed ID: 15734375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The mosaic valve clinical performance at seven years: results from a multicenter prospective clinical trial.
Fradet G; Bleese N; Busse E; Jamieson E; Raudkivi P; Goldstein J; Metras J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):239-46; discussion 246-7. PubMed ID: 15086263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?
Antunes MJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Oct; 98(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 2796355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children.
Milano A; Vouhé PR; Baillot-Vernant F; Donzeau-Gouge P; Trinquet F; Roux PM; Leca F; Neveux JY
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 92(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 3736079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
