These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16937164)

  • 1. Factors affecting the stimulus artifact tail in surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials.
    Hua Y; Lovely DF; Doraiswami R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(3):226-41. PubMed ID: 16937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of recording instrumentation on the stimulus artifact tail in the surface acquisition of somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Hamming N; Lovely DF
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 16442829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of methods for eliciting somatosensory-evoked potentials in the awake, freely moving rat.
    Stienen PJ; Haberham ZL; van den Brom WE; de Groot HN; Venker-Van Haagen AJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Jun; 126(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 12788504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear adaptive filtering of stimulus artifact.
    Grieve R; Parker PA; Hudgins B; Englehart K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Mar; 47(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 10743781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of stimulus artifact in somatosensory evoked potentials: segmented versus subthreshold training.
    Boudreau BH; Englehart KB; Chan AD; Parker PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1187-95. PubMed ID: 15248535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal segmentation and multiple-source analysis of short-latency median nerve SEPs.
    Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Grandori F; Budai R; Locatelli T; Cursi M; Di Benedetto G; Comi G
    J Med Eng Technol; 1995; 19(2-3):70-6. PubMed ID: 7494213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive stimulus artifact reduction in noncortical somatosensory evoked potential studies.
    Parsa V; Parker PA; Scott RN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Feb; 45(2):165-79. PubMed ID: 9473840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Steady-state analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Noss RS; Boles CD; Yingling CD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 100(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 8893664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A hybrid hardware and software approach for cancelling stimulus artifacts during same-electrode neural stimulation and recording.
    Culaclii S; Kim B; Yi-Kai Lo ; Wentai Liu
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():6190-6193. PubMed ID: 28269665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Somatosensory evoked potentials in children and adolescents during stimulation of the median nerve. Anthropological measurements: Part I].
    Zgorzalewicz M; Kilarski D; Nowak R
    Przegl Lek; 2003; 60 Suppl 1():28-33. PubMed ID: 12945158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of evoked response latency and amplitude on stimulus artifact removal.
    Oyama AM; Itiki C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6091-4. PubMed ID: 21097131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between primary somatosensory cortex- and vertex-derived somatosensory-evoked potentials in the rat.
    Stienen PJ; van den Brom WE; de Groot HN; Venker-van Haagen AJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 1030(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 15571674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the use of information theory for the analysis of synchronous nociceptive withdrawal reflexes and somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by graded electrical stimulation.
    Arguissain FG; Biurrun Manresa JA; Mørch CD; Andersen OK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():1-12. PubMed ID: 25455345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards non-invasive multi-unit spike recordings: mapping 1kHz EEG signals over human somatosensory cortex.
    Fedele T; Scheer HJ; Waterstraat G; Telenczuk B; Burghoff M; Curio G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Dec; 123(12):2370-6. PubMed ID: 22710032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated removal of stimulus artifact in nerve conduction studies.
    Tracey BH; Krishnamachari S
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6360-3. PubMed ID: 17945961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design, simulation and experimental validation of a novel flexible neural probe for deep brain stimulation and multichannel recording.
    Lai HY; Liao LD; Lin CT; Hsu JH; He X; Chen YY; Chang JY; Chen HF; Tsang S; Shih YY
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036001. PubMed ID: 22488106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of d.c. electrical stimulation in evoking and recording gustatory brain potentials.
    Fitzsimons M; Sheahan NF; van der Putten W; Malone JF
    Physiol Meas; 1999 Nov; 20(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 10593232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A motion artifact generation and assessment system for the rapid testing of surface biopotential electrodes.
    Cömert A; Hyttinen J
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jan; 36(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 25500614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of velocity filters to somatosensory evoked potential measurements for removal of stimulus artifact.
    Yazdani N; Chan AD
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6213-6. PubMed ID: 17945946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the possible effect of electrode support structure on motion artifact in wearable bioelectric signal monitoring.
    Cömert A; Hyttinen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 May; 14():44. PubMed ID: 25976349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.