280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16937747)
1. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.
Prieto L; Lopez V; Llusar R; Rojas R; Marin J
Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 18625670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between airway responsiveness and peak expiratory flow variability in subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Prieto L; Gutiérrez V; Bertó JM; Tornero C; Camps B; Pérez MJ
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Sep; 75(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 7552931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two ATS recommended protocols for administration of methacholine are not equal.
Burke RR; Obeid IM; Williams LK; Morris ZQ
J Asthma; 2009 Sep; 46(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 19728216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of challenge method on sensitivity and reactivity to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with suspected asthma.
Prieto L; Reig I; Rojas R; Ferrer A; Domenech J
Chest; 2006 Nov; 130(5):1448-53. PubMed ID: 17099023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection.
Allen ND; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
Chest; 2005 Dec; 128(6):4018-23. PubMed ID: 16354875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bronchial challenge, assessed with forced expiratory manoeuvres and airway impedance.
Broeders ME; Molema J; Hop WC; Folgering HT
Respir Med; 2005 Aug; 99(8):1046-52. PubMed ID: 15950147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose versus concentration of methacholine.
Drotar DE; Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Sep; 83(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 10507268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability of peak expiratory flow rate in allergic rhinitis and mild asthma: relationship to maximal airway narrowing.
Prieto L; Gutiérrez V; Morales C; Perpiñan J; Inchaurraga I
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Feb; 80(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 9494447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methacholine inhalation challenge. Practical consequences of using duplicate spirograms after each concentration.
Prieto L; Marín J
Ann Allergy; 1993 Jun; 70(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 8507045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between airway sensitivity to adenosine 5' monophosphate and the shape of the concentration-response curve to methacholine in subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Prieto L; Gutiérrez V; Marín J
Respir Med; 2001 Jun; 95(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 11421502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result.
Cockcroft DW; Davis BE
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1244-8. PubMed ID: 16750982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpretation of positive results of a methacholine inhalation challenge and 1 week of inhaled bronchodilator use in diagnosing and treating cough-variant asthma.
Irwin RS; French CT; Smyrnios NA; Curley FJ
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Sep; 157(17):1981-7. PubMed ID: 9308510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modifications in forced vital capacity during adenosine monophosphate-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma: relationship with the response to methacholine and the effect of inhaled corticosteroids.
Prieto L; López V; Catalan P; Barato D; Marín J
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2009 May; 102(5):393-9. PubMed ID: 19492660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methacholine challenge--comparison of an ATS protocol to a new rapid single concentration technique.
Schulze J; Rosewich M; Riemer C; Dressler M; Rose MA; Zielen S
Respir Med; 2009 Dec; 103(12):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19596563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of 2 methods of continuous aerosol administration during methacholine challenge testing.
Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW; Hannah VD; Davis BE
Respir Care; 2006 Jan; 51(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 16381617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The links between allergen skin test sensitivity, airway responsiveness and airway response to allergen.
Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Boulet LP; Deschesnes F; Gauvreau GM; O'Byrne PM; Watson RM
Allergy; 2005 Jan; 60(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 15575931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
