These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16937896)

  • 1. Does the effect of familiarity on proofreading change with encoding task and time?
    Pilotti M; Maxwell K; Chodorow M
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jul; 133(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 16937896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Middleton EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?
    Verde MF; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 14516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing text representations with recognition: The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence.
    Long DL; Wilson J; Hurley R; Prat CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 16822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.
    Wolfe MB; Woodwyk JM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):341-62. PubMed ID: 20128958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Representational change and analogy: how analogical inferences alter target representations.
    Blanchette I; Dunbar K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):672-85. PubMed ID: 12109761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Text familiarity, word frequency, and sentential constraints in error detection.
    Pilotti M; Chodorow M; Schauss F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Dec; 109(3):627-45. PubMed ID: 20178261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Error detection in text: do feedback and familiarity help?
    Pilotti M; Chodorow M; Thornton KC
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):242-66. PubMed ID: 15248593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
    Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers.
    Swanson HL; O'Connor R
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(6):548-75. PubMed ID: 19745196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics.
    Deacon SH; Parrila R; Kirby JR
    Ann Dyslexia; 2006 Jun; 56(1):103-28. PubMed ID: 17849210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.