120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938045)
1. The role of syntactic obligatoriness in the production of intonational boundaries.
Watson D; Breen M; Gibson E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1045-56. PubMed ID: 16938045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients.
Shah AP; Baum SR; Dwivedi VD
Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 15922444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface.
Allum PH; Wheeldon L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1240-55. PubMed ID: 19686018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)?
Tooley KM; Konopka AE; Watson DG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):348-63. PubMed ID: 24188467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences.
Millotte S; René A; Wales R; Christophe A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):874-85. PubMed ID: 18605875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
Kim S; Cho T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploration of lexical-semantic factors affecting stress production in derived words.
Jarmulowicz L; Taran VL
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):378-89. PubMed ID: 17890517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
Männel C; Friederici AD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
Isel F
Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent processing of words and their replacements during speech.
Hartsuiker RJ; Catchpole CM; de Jong NH; Pickering MJ
Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 18547556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relation between content and structure in language production: an analysis of speech errors in semantic dementia.
Meteyard L; Patterson K
Brain Lang; 2009 Sep; 110(3):121-34. PubMed ID: 19477502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production.
Abdel Rahman R; Melinger A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 17470008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How does the homophone meaning generation test associate with the phonemic and semantic fluency tests? A quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Kavé G; Avraham A; Kukulansky-Segal D; Herzberg O
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 May; 13(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 17445291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On phrase structure and brain responses: a comment on Bahlmann, Gunter, and Friederici (2006).
Corballis MC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1581-3. PubMed ID: 17854279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.
Lee MW; Gibbons J
Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):446-56. PubMed ID: 17097626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The processing of free and bound gender-marked morphemes in speech production: evidence from Dutch.
Lemhöfer K; Schriefers H; Jescheniak JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):437-42. PubMed ID: 16569158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing priming for prosodic representations: Speaking rate, intonational phrase boundaries, and pitch accenting.
Tooley KM; Konopka AE; Watson DG
Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):625-641. PubMed ID: 29349696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
