These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938051)

  • 1. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Illusions of competence for phonetically, orthographically, and semantically similar word pairs.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 20025388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):959-72. PubMed ID: 17128596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15755238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging, encoding fluency, and metacognitive monitoring.
    Emanuel Robinson A; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):458-78. PubMed ID: 16887783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning.
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit.
    Yan VX; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jul; 145(7):918-33. PubMed ID: 27227415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):36-69. PubMed ID: 16478315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.