These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938796)

  • 21. Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).
    Brännström KJ; Wennerström I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):512-21. PubMed ID: 21034698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL).
    Wu YH; Ho HC; Hsiao SH; Brummet RB; Chipara O
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):285-94. PubMed ID: 26878163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of self-efficacy, expectations, and readiness on hearing aid outcomes.
    Ferguson MA; Woolley A; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S34-41. PubMed ID: 27266542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids and uni- and bilateral fittings.
    Metselaar M; Maat B; Krijnen P; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA; Feenstra L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 266(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 19005632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of hearing aids on hearing disability and quality of life in the elderly.
    Vuorialho A; Karinen P; Sorri M
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 16938798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living.
    Walden TC; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):342-52. PubMed ID: 15506496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development and validation of the audio processor satisfaction questionnaire (APSQ) for hearing implant users.
    Billinger-Finke M; Bräcker T; Weber A; Amann E; Anderson I; Batsoulis C
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):392-397. PubMed ID: 31944127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Mauzé E; Schroy C; Barcroft J; Spehar B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):623-34. PubMed ID: 22967737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Responses of elderly hearing aid users on the hearing aid performance inventory.
    Schum DJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 1421466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
    Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
    Munro KJ; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):555-62. PubMed ID: 15724519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.
    Knudsen LV; Oberg M; Nielsen C; Naylor G; Kramer SE
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Sep; 14(3):127-54. PubMed ID: 21109549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation for adult hearing aid users in a South African context.
    Pienaar E; Stearn N; Swanepoel de W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2010 Dec; 57():4, 6, 8 passim. PubMed ID: 21329261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [User benefit of modern hearing aids. A comparative study].
    Kießling J; Kreikemeier S
    HNO; 2013 Aug; 61(8):662-9. PubMed ID: 23744085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Acclimatization: speech recognition in hearing aid users].
    Prates LP; Iório MC
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 17180794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.
    Cox RM; Schwartz KS; Noe CM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 20890203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters.
    Anderson M; Rallapalli V; Schoof T; Souza P; Arehart K
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):809-815. PubMed ID: 30052097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Style preference survey: a report on the psychometric properties and a cross-validation experiment.
    Smith SL; Ricketts T; McArdle RA; Chisolm TH; Alexander G; Bratt G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):89-104. PubMed ID: 23357803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study.
    Takahashi G; Martinez CD; Beamer S; Bridges J; Noffsinger D; Sugiura K; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):323-49. PubMed ID: 17580727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring the Effects of the Narrative Embodied in the Hearing Aid Fitting Process on Treatment Outcomes.
    Naylor G; Öberg M; Wänström G; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):517-26. PubMed ID: 25811932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.