130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938977)
1. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits.
Porter CA; Martin GK; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):884-900. PubMed ID: 16938977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Howard MA; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: II. Prediction of chronic-noise effects by brief pure-tone exposures.
Mensh BD; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8276733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
Stamper GC; Johnson TA
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An intracochlear DP-gram: Proof of principle in noise-damaged rabbits.
Martin GK; Stagner BB; Dong W; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 396():108058. PubMed ID: 32871416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Vázquez AE; Jimenez AM; Martin GK; Luebke AE; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.
Harding GW; Bohne BA; Lee SC; Salt AN
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 17300889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maturation of cochlear nonlinearity as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in humans.
Abdala C; Chatterjee M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):932-43. PubMed ID: 12942974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
Chang KW; Norton SJ
Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 8817301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans.
Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 7608400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Konrad-Martin D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):271-84. PubMed ID: 11831801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
