130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938977)
21. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Auditory brainstem responses in the bat Carollia perspicillata: threshold calculation and relation to audiograms based on otoacoustic emission measurement.
Wetekam J; Reissig C; Hechavarria JC; Kössl M
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2020 Jan; 206(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 31853637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CD1 hearing-impaired mice. I: Distortion product otoacoustic emission levels, cochlear function and morphology.
Le Calvez S; Avan P; Gilain L; Romand R
Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):37-50. PubMed ID: 9667429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
Canlon B; Marklund K; Borg E
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits.
Martin GK; Stagner BB; Jassir D; Telischi FF; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):105-23. PubMed ID: 10511630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Neely ST; Gorga MP; Dorn PA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1499-507. PubMed ID: 14514203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold.
Pienkowski M; Kunov H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1496-502. PubMed ID: 11325121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
Konopka W; Olszewski J
Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.
Howard MA; Stagner BB; Foster PK; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):279-93. PubMed ID: 12880041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
Abel C; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function?
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3572-80. PubMed ID: 15658708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
