These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938978)

  • 1. Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.
    Schairer KS; Ellison JC; Fitzpatrick D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):901-14. PubMed ID: 16938978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears.
    Schairer KS; Fitzpatrick D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):944-66. PubMed ID: 12942975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.
    Shera CA; Tubis A; Talmadge CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):381-95. PubMed ID: 18646984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
    Dewey JB; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.
    Abdala C; Ortmann AJ; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):493-510. PubMed ID: 29968098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the Influence of Extended High-Frequency Hearing on Cochlear Functioning at Lower Frequencies.
    Mishra SK; Rodrigo H; Balan JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 67(7):2473-2482. PubMed ID: 38820241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears.
    Schairer KS; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):818-32. PubMed ID: 15759702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.
    Abdala C; Guardia YC; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):181. PubMed ID: 29390734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.
    Konrad-Martin D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3799-815. PubMed ID: 16018483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Charaziak KK; Souza PE; Siegel JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 25290042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Souter M
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):167-77. PubMed ID: 8647718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.
    Shera CA; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):782-98. PubMed ID: 9972564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.
    Abdala C; Luo P; Guardia Y
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519889226. PubMed ID: 31789131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear reflection as a cause of the short-latency component in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions simulated by the methods of compression and suppression.
    Vencovský V; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3992. PubMed ID: 32611132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.
    Rasetshwane DM; Bosen EC; Kopun JG; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4481. PubMed ID: 31893726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.
    Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):843-62. PubMed ID: 24013802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 16(6):679-94. PubMed ID: 26373935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.