BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16938987)

  • 1. The occurrence of the Coanda effect in pulsatile flow through static models of the human vocal folds.
    Erath BD; Plesniak MW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):1000-11. PubMed ID: 16938987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental analysis of the pressures and flows within a driven mechanical model of phonation.
    Kucinschi BR; Scherer RC; Dewitt KJ; Ng TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3011-21. PubMed ID: 16708957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow separation in a computational oscillating vocal fold model.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1710-9. PubMed ID: 15478438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetric airflow and vibration induced by the Coanda effect in a symmetric model of the vocal folds.
    Tao C; Zhang Y; Hottinger DG; Jiang JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2270-8. PubMed ID: 17902863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical assessment of unsteady aerodynamic effects in phonation.
    Krane MH; Wei T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1578-88. PubMed ID: 17004480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetric glottal jet deflection: differences of two- and three-dimensional models.
    Mattheus W; Brücker C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):EL373-9. PubMed ID: 22225129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A theoretical model of the pressure field arising from asymmetric intraglottal flows applied to a two-mass model of the vocal folds.
    Erath BD; Peterson SD; Zañartu M; Wodicka GR; Plesniak MW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 21786907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa.
    Chan RW; Titze IR; Titze MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3722-7. PubMed ID: 9193059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation of vocal fold impact pressures with a self-oscillating finite-element model.
    Tao C; Jiang JJ; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3987-94. PubMed ID: 16838541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow visualization and acoustic consequences of the air moving through a static model of the human larynx.
    Kucinschi BR; Scherer RC; DeWitt KJ; Ng TT
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 16706587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsteady behavior of flow in a scaled-up vocal folds model.
    Krane M; Barry M; Wei T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3659-70. PubMed ID: 18247773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational study of false vocal folds effects on unsteady airflows through static models of the human larynx.
    Farbos de Luzan C; Chen J; Mihaescu M; Khosla SM; Gutmark E
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1248-57. PubMed ID: 25835787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of collision on the flow through in-vitro rigid models of the vocal folds.
    Deverge M; Pelorson X; Vilain C; Lagrée PY; Chentouf F; Willems J; Hirschberg A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3354-62. PubMed ID: 14714815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can vocal economy in phonation be increased with an artificially lengthened vocal tract? A computer modeling study.
    Titze IR; Laukkanen AM
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2007; 32(4):147-56. PubMed ID: 17917981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of the false vocal fold gaps on intralaryngeal pressure distributions and their effects on phonation.
    Li S; Wan M; Wang S
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1045-51. PubMed ID: 18989648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical study of the effects of inferior and superior vocal fold surface angles on vocal fold pressure distributions.
    Li S; Scherer RC; Wan M; Wang S; Wu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3003-10. PubMed ID: 16708956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A numerical analysis of phonation using a two-dimensional flexible channel model of the vocal folds.
    Ikeda T; Matsuzaki Y; Aomatsu T
    J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):571-9. PubMed ID: 11783728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of impact stress using an aeroelastic model of voice production.
    Horácek J; Laukkanen AM; Sidlof P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2007; 32(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 17990190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction.
    Zañartu M; Galindo GE; Erath BD; Peterson SD; Wodicka GR; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3262. PubMed ID: 25480072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the ventricular folds in a synthetic larynx model.
    Kniesburges S; Birk V; Lodermeyer A; Schützenberger A; Bohr C; Becker S
    J Biomech; 2017 Apr; 55():128-133. PubMed ID: 28285747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.