734 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16939020)
1. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
