564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16939480)
1. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
Perner A; Faber T
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during different loading conditions in a paediatric animal model.
Renner J; Cavus E; Meybohm P; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Boening A; Bein B
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Mar; 52(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 18205899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Musard H; Desebbe O; Boucau C; Simon R; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis].
Yu YH; Dai HW; Yan ML; Gong SJ; Cai GL; Zhang ZC; Chen J; Yan J
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Hedderich J; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 19076570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing fluid responses after coronary surgery: role of mathematical coupling of global end-diastolic volume to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution.
Breukers RM; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Jansen JR; Faes TJ; Twisk JW; Groeneveld AB
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Nov; 26(11):954-60. PubMed ID: 19652601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock.
Trof RJ; Beishuizen A; Cornet AD; de Wit RJ; Girbes AR; Groeneveld AB
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22202713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of PiCCO versus LiDCO variables to detect changes in cardiac index: a prospective clinical study.
Donati A; Nardella R; Gabbanelli V; Scarcella M; Romanelli M; Romagnoli L; Botticelli L; Pantanetti S; Pelaia P
Minerva Anestesiol; 2008; 74(7-8):367-74. PubMed ID: 18414371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution.
Fischer MO; Coucoravas J; Truong J; Zhu L; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Jul; 57(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 23521161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
Heenen S; De Backer D; Vincent JL
Crit Care; 2006; 10(4):R102. PubMed ID: 16846530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Less invasive indicators of changes in thermodilution cardiac output by ventilatory changes after cardiac surgery.
Breukers RM; Willems JH; de Wilde R; Jansen JR; Groeneveld AJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Oct; 26(10):863-7. PubMed ID: 19390444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
