BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16940966)

  • 21. Probability fold change: a robust computational approach for identifying differentially expressed gene lists.
    Deng X; Xu J; Hui J; Wang C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Feb; 93(2):124-39. PubMed ID: 18842321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Data analysis methods for detection of differential protein expression in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
    Meunier B; Bouley J; Piec I; Bernard C; Picard B; Hocquette JF
    Anal Biochem; 2005 May; 340(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 15840495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correcting the estimated level of differential expression for gene selection bias: application to a microarray study.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article10. PubMed ID: 18384263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selection of relevant genes in cancer diagnosis based on their prediction accuracy.
    Maglietta R; D'Addabbo A; Piepoli A; Perri F; Liuni S; Pesole G; Ancona N
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 16920342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identification of differential gene expression for microarray data using recursive random forest.
    Wu XY; Wu ZY; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2492-6. PubMed ID: 19187584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clustering threshold gradient descent regularization: with applications to microarray studies.
    Ma S; Huang J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 17182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
    Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multivariate exploratory tools for microarray data analysis.
    Szabo A; Boucher K; Jones D; Tsodikov AD; Klebanov LB; Yakovlev AY
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):555-67. PubMed ID: 14557111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of microarray and sage techniques in gene expression analysis of human glioblastoma.
    Kavsan VM; Dmitrenko VV; Shostak KO; Bukreieva TV; Vitak NY; Simirenko OE; Malisheva TA; Shamayev MI; Rozumenko VD; Zozulya YA
    Tsitol Genet; 2007; 41(1):36-55. PubMed ID: 17427416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EVE (external variance estimation) increases statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes.
    Wille A; Gruissem W; Bühlmann P; Hennig L
    Plant J; 2007 Nov; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 17680783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of gene induction enables a relevance-based ranking of gene sets.
    Bartholomé K; Kreutz C; Timmer J
    J Comput Biol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):959-67. PubMed ID: 19580524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of host response to bacterial infection using error model based gene expression microarray experiments.
    Stekel DJ; Sarti D; Trevino V; Zhang L; Salmon M; Buckley CD; Stevens M; Pallen MJ; Penn C; Falciani F
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Mar; 33(6):e53. PubMed ID: 15800204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ameliorative missing value imputation for robust biological knowledge inference.
    Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS; Coppel R
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Aug; 41(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 18334307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Linear mixed model selection for false discovery rate control in microarray data analysis.
    Demirkale CY; Nettleton D; Maiti T
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):621-9. PubMed ID: 19522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification of gene transcript signatures predictive for estrogen receptor and lymph node status using a stepwise forward selection artificial neural network modelling approach.
    Lancashire LJ; Rees RC; Ball GR
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jun; 43(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 18420392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing three methods for variance estimation with duplicated high density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Huang X; Pan W
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2002 Aug; 2(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 12185460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiclass cancer classification by support vector machines with class-wise optimized genes and probability estimates.
    Anand A; Suganthan PN
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(3):533-40. PubMed ID: 19406131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.
    Cui X; Hwang JT; Qiu J; Blades NJ; Churchill GA
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15618528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gene profiling for determining pluripotent genes in a time course microarray experiment.
    Tuke J; Glonek GF; Solomon PJ
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 18562347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.