These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16941091)

  • 1. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography.
    Schmidt S; Chevallier P; Novellas S; Gelsi E; Vanbiervliet G; Tran A; Schnyder P; Bruneton JN
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 16941091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
    Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
    Mesihović R; Mehmedović A
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis.
    Guarise A; Baltieri S; Mainardi P; Faccioli N
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
    Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.
    Giljaca V; Gurusamy KS; Takwoingi Y; Higgie D; Poropat G; Štimac D; Davidson BR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD011549. PubMed ID: 25719224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
    Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
    Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Tang Y; Urata J; Sumi S; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
    Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study.
    Aubé C; Delorme B; Yzet T; Burtin P; Lebigot J; Pessaux P; Gondry-Jouet C; Boyer J; Caron C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15615951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suspected choledocholithiasis: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography? A systematic review.
    Ledro-Cano D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1007-11. PubMed ID: 18049172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scoring system to preoperatively predict choledocholithiasis.
    Kamath SU; Dharap SB; Kumar V
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 35(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 27146040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
    Hjartarson JH; Hannesson P; Sverrisson I; Blöndal S; Ívarsson B; Björnsson ES
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of ASGE high-risk criteria in evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
    He H; Tan C; Wu J; Dai N; Hu W; Zhang Y; Laine L; Scheiman J; Kim JJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 28174126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved diagnosis of common bile duct stone with single-shot balanced turbo field-echo sequence in MRCP.
    Noda Y; Goshima S; Kojima T; Kawaguchi S; Kawada H; Kawai N; Koyasu H; Matsuo M; Bae KT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1183-1188. PubMed ID: 27891550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
    Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
    Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study.
    de Lédinghen V; Lecesne R; Raymond JM; Gense V; Amouretti M; Drouillard J; Couzigou P; Silvain C
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jan; 49(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 9869719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a prospective study.
    Fernández-Esparrach G; Ginès A; Sánchez M; Pagés M; Pellisé M; Fernández-Cruz L; López-Boado MA; Quintó L; Navarro S; Sendino O; Cárdenas A; Ayuso C; Bordas JM; Llach J; Castells A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Aug; 102(8):1632-9. PubMed ID: 17521400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.