251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16941155)
21. Separate processing mechanisms for encoding of geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus.
Tommasi L; Gagliardo A; Andrew RJ; Vallortigara G
Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 17(8):1695-702. PubMed ID: 12752387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Landmark-based search memory in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).
Fiset S
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 18085917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks.
Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 19960217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mice recognize the center of an enclosure.
Inoue N; Watanabe S
Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 22772396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment.
Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 17629754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Generalization in place learning across geometrically different environments is impaired by hippocampal lesions in rats.
Tommasi L; Save E
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Jul; 84(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15936678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures.
Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM
Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Features enhance the encoding of geometry.
Kelly DM
Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):453-62. PubMed ID: 20012120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Geometry and landmark representation by pigeons: evidence for species-differences in the hemispheric organization of spatial information processing?
Wilzeck C; Prior H; Kelly DM
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(4):813-22. PubMed ID: 19200073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pigeons encode absolute distance but relational direction from landmarks and walls.
Gray ER; Spetch ML
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 17044750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.
Sturz BR; Kelly DM
Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19576273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model.
Sheynikhovich D; Chavarriaga R; Strösslin T; Arleo A; Gerstner W
Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):540-66. PubMed ID: 19618986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry.
Gray ER; Bloomfield LL; Ferrey A; Spetch ML; Sturdy CB
Biol Lett; 2005 Sep; 1(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 17148196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of embryonic light stimulation on the ability to discriminate left from right in the domestic chick.
Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 19059286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rats with hippocampal lesion show impaired learning and memory in the ziggurat task: a new task to evaluate spatial behavior.
Faraji J; Lehmann H; Metz GA; Sutherland RJ
Behav Brain Res; 2008 May; 189(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18192033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Route and landmark learning by rats searching for food.
Tamara C; Timberlake W
Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21044664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Landmark use by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana): influence of disorientation and cue rotation on distance and direction estimates.
Kelly DM; Kamil AC; Cheng K
Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):175-88. PubMed ID: 19579038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pigeons encode relative geometry.
Kelly DM; Spetch ML
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Oct; 27(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 11676090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.
Andersen NE; Dahmani L; Konishi K; Bohbot VD
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Jan; 97(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22001012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
