These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16941296)

  • 21. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
    Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of axial and torsional loading on strain distribution in the proximal femur as related to cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jul; (292):376-83. PubMed ID: 8519135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
    Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements.
    Ramos A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 16813449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
    Andreaus U; Colloca M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.
    Bah MT; Nair PB; Browne M
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1235-43. PubMed ID: 19744873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head.
    Taylor M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 16669395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Biomechanical evaluation of the gliding nail in trochanteric fractures].
    Helwig P; Faust G; Hindenlang U; Suckel A; Kröplin B; Südkamp N
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(6):594-601. PubMed ID: 17187334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.