These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16941993)

  • 1. An investigation into the kerbside recycling behaviour of two Welsh case study authorities.
    Woollam T; Williams KW; Griffiths A
    Waste Manag Res; 2006 Aug; 24(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 16941993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of recycling programmes in household waste collection systems.
    Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Jul; 28(7):577-86. PubMed ID: 19748961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of a UK kerbside scheme using known practice.
    Woodard R; Bench M; Harder MK
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Apr; 75(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 15763154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the relationship between set-out rates and participation ratios as a tool for enhancement of kerbside household waste recycling.
    Shaw PJ; Lyas JK; Maynard SJ; van Vugt M
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 16631302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and application of a multiple linear regression model to consider the impact of weekly waste container capacity on the yield from kerbside recycling programmes in Scotland.
    Baird J; Curry R; Reid T
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 23315369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustainable kerbside recycling in the municipal garbage contract.
    Chowdhury M
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Dec; 27(10):988-95. PubMed ID: 19710113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark).
    Larsen AW; Merrild H; Møller J; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2010 May; 30(5):744-54. PubMed ID: 19945262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of Local Authorities' interventions on household waste collection: a case study approach using time series modelling.
    Cole C; Quddus M; Wheatley A; Osmani M; Kay K
    Waste Manag; 2014 Feb; 34(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 24256716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The potential of financial incentives to enhance householders' kerbside recycling behaviour.
    Shaw PJ; Maynard SJ
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(10):1732-41. PubMed ID: 17904348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Vukicevic S; Meijer JE; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1298-305. PubMed ID: 17010597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: a case study.
    Bandara NJ; Hettiaratchi JP; Wirasinghe SC; Pilapiiya S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Dec; 135(1-3):31-9. PubMed ID: 17450419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of alternate weekly collections on waste arisings.
    Williams ID; Cole C
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Feb; 445-446():29-40. PubMed ID: 23314120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-scale home composting of biodegradable household waste: overview of key results from a 3-year research programme in West London.
    Smith SR; Jasim S
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Dec; 27(10):941-50. PubMed ID: 19487317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sustainable pattern analysis of a publicly owned Material Recovery Facility in a fast-growing urban setting under uncertainty.
    Davila E; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):337-51. PubMed ID: 15854727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A survey of recycling behaviour in households in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    Afroz R; Hanaki K; Tuddin R; Ayupp K
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Jun; 28(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 19942645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste.
    Rousta K; Bolton K; Lundin M; Dahlén L
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():22-30. PubMed ID: 25817721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximising household waste recycling at civic amenity sites in Lancashire, England.
    Williams ID; Taylor C
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(9):861-74. PubMed ID: 15504664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19833498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A problem unstuck? Evaluating the effectiveness of sticker prompts for encouraging household food waste recycling behaviour.
    Shearer L; Gatersleben B; Morse S; Smyth M; Hunt S
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 27697423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disposal frequencies of selected recyclable wastes in Dar es Salaam.
    Mgaya P; Nondek L
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(9):927-33. PubMed ID: 15504670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.