These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16942721)

  • 1. [Relative survival computation. Comparison of methods for estimating expected survival].
    Clèries R; Ribes J; Moreno V; Esteban L; Pareja L; Gálvez J; Martínez JM; Bosch FX; Borràs JM
    Gac Sanit; 2006; 20(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 16942721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
    ; ;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer net survival on registry data: use of the new unbiased Pohar-Perme estimator and magnitude of the bias with the classical methods.
    Roche L; Danieli C; Belot A; Grosclaude P; Bouvier AM; Velten M; Iwaz J; Remontet L; Bossard N
    Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2359-69. PubMed ID: 22961565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On standardized relative survival.
    Sasieni P; Brentnall AR
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):473-482. PubMed ID: 27554303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. periodR - an R package to calculate long-term cancer survival estimates using period analysis.
    Holleczek B; Gondos A; Brenner H
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 19283308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating relative survival for cancer: An analysis of bias introduced by outdated life tables.
    Ellison LF
    Health Rep; 2014 Feb; 25(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 24567246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choosing the net survival method for cancer survival estimation.
    Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Pokhrel A
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24183462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges in the estimation of Net SURvival: The CENSUR working survival group.
    Giorgi R;
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2016 Oct; 64(5):367-371. PubMed ID: 27793412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival from cancer--up-to-date predictions using period analysis.
    Ellison LF; Gibbons L
    Health Rep; 2006 May; 17(2):19-30. PubMed ID: 16716033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. WAERS: an application for Web-assisted estimation of relative survival.
    Clèries R; Valls J; Esteban L; Gálvez J; Pareja L; Sanz X; Alliste L; Martínez JM; Moreno V; Bosch X; Borràs JM; Ribes JM
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2007 Sep; 32(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 17701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of additional life-table variables on excess mortality estimates.
    Grafféo N; Jooste V; Giorgi R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4219-30. PubMed ID: 22806957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
    ; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cancer survival model that takes sociodemographic variations in "normal" mortality into account: comparison with other models.
    Kravdal Ø
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2002 Apr; 56(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 11896140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Regression models for crude and relative survival: a comparative review].
    Giorgi R; Armanet A; Gouvernet J; Bonnier P; Fieschi M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2005 Sep; 53(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16353516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing net survival estimators of cancer patients.
    Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Läärä E; Pitkäniemi J
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1866-79. PubMed ID: 26707551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long term outcomes following hospital admission for sepsis using relative survival analysis: a prospective cohort study of 1,092 patients with 5 year follow up.
    Davis JS; He V; Anstey NM; Condon JR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e112224. PubMed ID: 25486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of relative survival vs. classical survival. Apropos of primary bronchial cancer].
    Foucher P; Coudert B; Dramais-Marcel D; Arveux P; Camus P; Jeannin L
    Bull Cancer; 1994 Oct; 81(10):857-65. PubMed ID: 7734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating expected survival probabilities for relative survival analysis--exploring the impact of including cancer patient mortality in the calculations.
    Talbäck M; Dickman PW
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2626-32. PubMed ID: 21924892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction: the EUROCARE II Study.
    Berrino F; Gatta G; Chessa E; Valente F; Capocaccia R
    Eur J Cancer; 1998 Dec; 34(14 Spec No):2139-53. PubMed ID: 10070280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
    Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.