BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16942850)

  • 1. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in the Northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens: implications for inner ear mechanics.
    Meenderink SW; Narins PM
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):67-75. PubMed ID: 16942850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens.
    Meenderink SW; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):107-18. PubMed ID: 15157969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.
    Shera CA; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):782-98. PubMed ID: 9972564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues hearing mechanisms in the frog ear.
    Vassilakis PN; Meenderink SW; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3713-26. PubMed ID: 15658721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.
    Meenderink SW; Narins PM; van Dijk P
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 15735935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the anuran ear.
    Meenderink SW; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):344-51. PubMed ID: 17297789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog from L1,L2 maps.
    Meenderink SW; van Dijk P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):279-86. PubMed ID: 16119349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Meenderink SW; van Dijk P
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 7(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 16724291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiological vulnerability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the amphibian ear.
    van Dijk P; Narins PM; Mason MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2044-8. PubMed ID: 14587603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions.
    Shera CA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):86-97. PubMed ID: 15064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation into the relationship between input-output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences.
    Lineton B; Thornton AR; Baker VJ
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):24-35. PubMed ID: 16839721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input/output function and cochlear reflectivity: experiment and model.
    Sisto R; Moleti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2995-3008. PubMed ID: 19045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2097-110. PubMed ID: 17471725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: testing cochlear model predictions.
    Konrad-Martin D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2021-43. PubMed ID: 14587602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive measurements of intralabyrinthine pressure changes by electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions.
    Büki B; Giraudet F; Avan P
    Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):51-9. PubMed ID: 19233252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volterra Slice otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    de Boer J; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):121-36. PubMed ID: 16887305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and nerve fiber responses from the basilar papilla of the frog.
    Meenderink SW; van Dijk P; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3165-73. PubMed ID: 15957784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties.
    van Dijk P; Mason MJ; Narins PM
    Hear Res; 2002 Nov; 173(1-2):100-8. PubMed ID: 12372639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.