These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16943335)

  • 21. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell EL
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 19482983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
    Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
    Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who's minding the shop? The role of Canadian research ethics boards in the creation and uses of registries and biobanks.
    Gibson E; Brazil K; Coughlin MD; Emerson C; Fournier F; Schwartz L; Szala-Meneok KV; Weisbaum KM; Willison DJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 9():17. PubMed ID: 19014594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A biobank management model applicable to biomedical research.
    Auray-Blais C; Patenaude J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 7():E4. PubMed ID: 16600040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canadian policy on reporting breaches of research integrity: When should Research Ethics Boards be informed?
    Page SA; Stalker MA
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):460-471. PubMed ID: 31462108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are we asking the right questions? A review of Canadian REB practices in relation to community-based participatory research.
    Guta A; Wilson MG; Flicker S; Travers R; Mason C; Wenyeve G; O'Campo P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):35-46. PubMed ID: 20569148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
    Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Informed consent for clinical anaesthesia research.
    Maltby JR; Eagle CJ
    Can J Anaesth; 1993 Sep; 40(9):891-6. PubMed ID: 8403186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Qualitative research ethics on the spot: Not only on the desktop.
    Øye C; Sørensen NØ; Glasdam S
    Nurs Ethics; 2016 Jun; 23(4):455-64. PubMed ID: 25665588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
    McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
    J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members' Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects.
    Cox SM; McDonald M; Townsend A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Dec; 15(5):383-395. PubMed ID: 31524031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: recommendations for institutional review boards.
    Flicker S; Travers R; Guta A; McDonald S; Meagher A
    J Urban Health; 2007 Jul; 84(4):478-93. PubMed ID: 17436114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A canadian perspective on ethics review and neuroimaging: tensions and solutions.
    Racine E; Northoff G; Menon RS; Kimmelman J; Illes J
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2011 Jul; 38(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 21672697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ethical and epistemological insights: a case study of participatory action research with young people.
    Chabot C; Shoveller JA; Spencer G; Johnson JL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Apr; 7(2):20-33. PubMed ID: 22565580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Satisfaction and Use of Research Ethics Board Information Systems in Canada.
    Detlor B; Wilson MJ
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 26306507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.