These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16943338)
1. Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects. Miller PB; Weijer C J Med Ethics; 2006 Sep; 32(9):542-7. PubMed ID: 16943338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research. Orentlicher D Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject. VanderWalde AM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician/investigator's obligation to patients participating in research: the case of placebo controlled trials. Glass KC; Waring D J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):575-85. PubMed ID: 16240737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care. Pellegrino ED J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 8750589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A legal duty to disclose individual research findings to research subjects? Gordon MP Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(1):225-60. PubMed ID: 19998747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Questioning the methodologic superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials. Howick J Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):34-48. PubMed ID: 19998192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials. Edwards SJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):3-12. PubMed ID: 21480063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical perspective on placebo research: looking back, looking forward. Dworkin RW Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):54-5. PubMed ID: 19998196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships with test-tubes: where's the reciprocity? Fryer-Edwards K; Fullerton SM Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):36-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Kass NE; Sugarman J; Faden R; Schoch-Spana M Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):25-9. PubMed ID: 8891706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ulysses contracts for the doctor and for the patient. Hansson MG; Hakama M Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20227524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical considerations in the communication of unexpected information with clinical implications. Lavieri RR; Garner SA Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):46-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rethinking research ethics. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research? Binik A; Weijer C; McRae AD; Grimshaw JM; Boruch R; Brehaut JC; Donner A; Eccles MP; Saginur R; Taljaard M; Zwarenstein M Trials; 2011 May; 12():118. PubMed ID: 21569349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disclosing conflicts of interest to research subjects: an ethical and legal analysis. Resnik DB Account Res; 2004; 11(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 15675055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics and nursing research. Fry ST Va Nurse; 1982; 50(2):16-21. PubMed ID: 6920209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Miller FG; Brody H Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]