391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16943473)
1. Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the Weber classification of ankle fractures.
Malek IA; Machani B; Mevcha AM; Hyder NH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 16943473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: the significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fractures.
Thomsen NO; Olsen LH; Nielsen ST
J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11956974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ankle fracture classification: a comparison of reliability of three X-ray views versus two.
Brage ME; Rockett M; Vraney R; Anderson R; Toledano A
Foot Ankle Int; 1998 Aug; 19(8):555-62. PubMed ID: 9728704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures.
Thomsen NO; Overgaard S; Olsen LH; Hansen H; Nielsen ST
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Jul; 73(4):676-8. PubMed ID: 2071659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer variation in the Lauge-Hansen classification of ankle fractures. Precision improved by instruction.
Rasmussen S; Madsen PV; Bennicke K
Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Dec; 64(6):693-4. PubMed ID: 8291419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of binary decision making on the classification of fractures of the ankle.
Craig WL; Dirschl DR
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 9619464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total talar fracture - inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of two classification systems (Hawkins and AO) for central talar fractures.
Williams T; Barba N; Noailles T; Steiger V; Pineau V; Carvalhana G; Le Jacques B; Clave A; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 98(4 Suppl):S56-65. PubMed ID: 22613935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of radiographic classifications for rotational ankle fractures.
Budny AM; Young BA
Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 2008 Apr; 25(2):139-52, v. PubMed ID: 18346587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observer reliability in ankle radiographic measurements.
Brage ME; Bennett CR; Whitehurst JB; Getty PJ; Toledano A
Foot Ankle Int; 1997 Jun; 18(6):324-9. PubMed ID: 9208288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.
Urrutia J; Zamora T; Klaber I; Carmona M; Palma J; Campos M; Yurac R
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of a classification of fractures of the hand based on the AO comprehensive classification system.
Szwebel JD; Ehlinger V; Pinsolle V; Bruneteau P; Pélissier P; Salmi LR
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2010 Jun; 35(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20100711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: how reliable are they?
Maripuri SN; Rao P; Manoj-Thomas A; Mohanty K
Injury; 2008 Oct; 39(10):1216-21. PubMed ID: 18439607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Dias-Tachdjian classification in pediatric ankle fractures: do clinical experience and expertise matter?
Demirel M; Yenigün MY; Mert L; Kendirci AŞ; Yağci TF; Demir TB; Sağlam Y; Cirdi Y; Yağdiran B; Korkmazer B
J Pediatr Orthop B; 2024 May; 33(3):240-245. PubMed ID: 37266919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiographic signs of scaphoid union after bone grafting: the analysis of inter-observer agreement and intra-observer reproducibility].
Mirić D; Vucković C; Djordjević Z
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2005; 133(3-4):142-5. PubMed ID: 16206702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reliability of a CT-based fracture classification system.
Humphrey CA; Dirschl DR; Ellis TJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Oct; 19(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 16247306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of specific radiological features in the classification of acetabular fractures.
Patel V; Day A; Dinah F; Kelly M; Bircher M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 17259420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model.
Dirschl DR; Adams GL
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):471-6. PubMed ID: 9334947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
