108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16944634)
1. Everyone uses E-mail now (except doctors and patients).
Manag Care; 2006 Aug; 15(8):51-3. PubMed ID: 16944634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. E-prescribing for all. A new industry group is looking to remove the technological and financial barriers that keep physicians from e-prescribing.
Guerra A
Healthc Inform; 2007 Mar; 24(3):26, 28. PubMed ID: 17427792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians slow to adopt patient e-mail.
Liebhaber AB; Grossman JM
Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change); 2006 Sep; (32):1-2. PubMed ID: 16995287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Don't LOL at virtual visits. Technology is allowing more doctors and patients to consult via e-mail, and insurance companies are reimbursing for it.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2007 Oct; 37(41):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 17972489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of the utilization of e-mail by physicians and patients: defining benefits, addressing concerns and forecasting implications on the doctor-patient relationship.
Lang KT; Kiel JM
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2008; 22(2):27-32. PubMed ID: 19266992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctor-patient e-mail getting hotter.
Internet Healthc Strateg; 2003 Dec; 5(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 14723116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Take two and e-mail me at your conveinence.
Gearon CJ
AHIP Cover; 2008; 49(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 18672810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physicians get message--slowly.
Schuerenberg BK
Health Data Manag; 2005 Sep; 13(9):52, 54, 56 passim. PubMed ID: 16334015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient e-mail. A growing trend.
Med Econ; 2003 Oct; 80(20):TCP10. PubMed ID: 14619071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The doctors' lounge moves online.
Pector EA
Med Econ; 2007 Nov; 84(21):69-70. PubMed ID: 18074934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Readers perspectives. Physician resistance to communicating with patients via e-mail is decreasing. Do you agree or disagree?
Grey MC; Schoff L; Guillaume MR; Conner J
Health Data Manag; 2005 Nov; 13(11):72. PubMed ID: 16335362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a scale to assess attitudes of health care administrators toward the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians.
Bhor M; Mason HL
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Dec; 2(4):512-32. PubMed ID: 17161809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. E-mail use in the radiology workplace.
Dowd SB; Davidhizar R
Radiol Manage; 2006; 28(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 16570496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical electronic communications: a new paradigm that is here to stay?
Eggert C; Protti D
Healthc Q; 2006; 9(4):88-96, 4. PubMed ID: 17076382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Online messaging opening clinical doors.
Martin Z
Health Data Manag; 2006 May; 14(5):26-8, 30, 32 passim. PubMed ID: 16722504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an e-mail database of US intensive care physicians.
Halpern SD; Hussen SA; Metkus TS; Ward NS; Luce JM; Curtis JR
J Crit Care; 2007 Mar; 22(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 17371741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery.
Rosen P; Kwoh CK
Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):701-6. PubMed ID: 17908755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online "visits": insurers pay but docs don't play.
Terry K
Med Econ; 2006 Sep; 83(17):30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 17037417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing an intervention to promote colon cancer screening through e-mail over the Internet: lessons learned from a pilot study.
Chan EC; Vernon SW
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S117-22. PubMed ID: 18725823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EM@IL and your patients. Too risky & time-consuming, or an idea whose time has come?
Weiss GG; Gordon B
Med Econ; 2011 Jun; 88(11):22-4, 29, 31-3. PubMed ID: 21850958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
