These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16945858)

  • 1. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):577-601. PubMed ID: 16104096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Frings C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 20079389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention in young women awakened from nocturnal sleep.
    Matchock RL; Mordkoff JT
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2005 Oct; 76(10):985-8. PubMed ID: 16235885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm.
    Cohen-Kdoshay O; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1140-54. PubMed ID: 17654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context modulates early stimulus processing when resolving stimulus-response conflict.
    Scerif G; Worden MS; Davidson M; Seiger L; Casey BJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):781-92. PubMed ID: 16768377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.
    Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Altered spatial distribution of visual attention in near and far space after early deafness.
    Chen Q; He G; Chen K; Jin Z; Mo L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2693-8. PubMed ID: 20478322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and gaze shifting in dual-task and go/no-go performance with vocal responding.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 21549333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of training and transfer on global/local processing.
    Dulaney CL; Marks W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 16914108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.