These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16945858)

  • 21. Mechanisms underlying flexible adaptation of cognitive control: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence in a flanker task.
    Zurawska Vel Grajewska B; Sim EJ; Hoenig K; Herrnberger B; Kiefer M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1421():52-65. PubMed ID: 21981803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task.
    Dong G; Yang L; Shen Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19446605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.
    Risko EF; Blais C; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18665744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
    Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex modulates response interference in a flanker task.
    Soto D; Montoro PR; Humphreys GW
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Feb; 451(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 19146925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Flanker interference in young and older participants as reflected in event-related potentials.
    Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M; Hohnsbein J
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1211():72-84. PubMed ID: 18433737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location.
    Valle-Inclán F; Sohn F; Redondo M
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 17971057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: children vs. adults.
    Kim EY; Iwaki N; Imashioya H; Uno H; Fujita T
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 17488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Zhang H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.