These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16946228)

  • 1. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimizing perinatal neurologic injury at term: is cesarean section the answer?
    Miller R; Depp R
    Clin Perinatol; 2008 Sep; 35(3):549-59, xi. PubMed ID: 18952021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy.
    Nelson KB; Dambrosia JM; Ting TY; Grether JK
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Mar; 334(10):613-8. PubMed ID: 8592523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update.
    Thacker SB; Stroup DF; Peterson HB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):613-20. PubMed ID: 7675390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prevention of perinatal asphyxia. Can more be done by fetal monitoring?].
    Herbst A
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3484-8. PubMed ID: 11037592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis.
    Becker JH; Bax L; Amer-Wåhlin I; Ojala K; Vayssière C; Westerhuis ME; Mol BW; Visser GH; Maršál K; Kwee A; Moons KG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 119(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 22183222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevention of cerebral palsy during labour: role of foetal lactate.
    Borruto F; Comparetto C; Treisser A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 278(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18071726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal.
    Maso G; Piccoli M; De Seta F; Parolin S; Banco R; Camacho Mattos L; Bogatti P; Alberico S
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Feb; 67(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 25411863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of perinatal and intrapartum risk factors in the etiology of cerebral palsy in term deliveries in a Turkish population.
    Gurbuz A; Karateke A; Yilmaz U; Kabaca C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 16690507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of fetal blood sampling on vaginal delivery and neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate: a population based cohort study.
    Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Misselwitz B; Schmidt S
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 17140298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring and the identification of systemic fetal inflammation.
    Aina-Mumuney AJ; Althaus JE; Henderson JL; Blakemore MC; Johnson EA; Graham EM
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Sep; 52(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 17939590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
    Ojala K; Vääräsmäki M; Mäkikallio K; Valkama M; Tekay A
    BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 16553653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Cahill AG; Spain J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 25811127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.