BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16946606)

  • 1. Three-year evaluation of the ART approach in Class III and V restorations in permanent anterior teeth.
    Cefaly DF; Tapety CM; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Phantumvanit P; Navarro MF
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(5):389-92. PubMed ID: 16946606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
    Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
    Yassen G
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth: review of literature.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 10969434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
    Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Survival of single surface ART-restorations in Zimbabwe after 3 years].
    Frencken JE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Jun; 106(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11930476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
    Mickenautsch S; Kopsala J; Rudolph MJ; Ogunbodede EO
    SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
    Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in permanent-tooth Class III restorations.
    Prakki A; Nunes MC; Cefaly DF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Jun; 10(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 18652273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
    Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 1, baseline data.
    Stewardson D; Thornley P; Bigg T; Bromage C; Browne A; Cottam D; Dalby D; Gilmour J; Horton J; Roberts E; Westoby L; Dietrich T; Burke T
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):E17; discussion 406-7. PubMed ID: 20448583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.