These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16946606)

  • 21. Evaluation of Class I ART restorations in Brazilian schoolchildren: three-year results.
    Wang L; Lopes LG; Bresciani E; Lauris JR; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF
    Spec Care Dentist; 2004; 24(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15157057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Restoration of primary anterior teeth: review of the literature.
    Lee JK
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 12412966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A technique for restoring Class V caries in primary canines.
    Margolis FS
    Gen Dent; 2008 May; 56(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 19288837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 10600076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children.
    Lo EC; Holmgren CJ; Hu D; van Palenstein Helderman W
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 35(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17822487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
    Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
    Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass ionomer sealants in Tunisian children: survival after 3 years.
    Abid A; Chkir F; Ben Salem K; Argoubi K; Sfar-Gandoura M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(2-3):315-23. PubMed ID: 15339119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term survival of indirect pulp treatment performed in primary and permanent teeth with clinically diagnosed deep carious lesions.
    Gruythuysen RJ; van Strijp AJ; Wu MK
    J Endod; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1490-3. PubMed ID: 20728715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van't Hof MA; Truin GJ; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 12641593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ART: a minimal intervention approach to manage dental caries.
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Dent Update; 2004 Jun; 31(5):295-8, 301. PubMed ID: 15242264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study.
    Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A
    Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD; Hackenitz E
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9544860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.