BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16946641)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis.
    Chiang MF; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Shih SL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E682-9. PubMed ID: 16946641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Chen WJ; Hung C
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 18760654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Bhatia NN; Lee KH; Bui CN; Luna M; Wahba GM; Lee TQ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation--a finite element study.
    Tsuang YH; Chiang YF; Hung CY; Wei HW; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19117789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and finite-element evaluation of a versatile assembled lumbar interbody fusion cage.
    Ding JY; Qian S; Wan L; Huang B; Wang LG; Zhou Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 20140621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.
    Xu H; Tang H; Guan X; Jiang F; Xu N; Ju W; Zhu X; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Li M
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Mar; 72(1 Suppl Operative):21-6. PubMed ID: 23037820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
    Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
    Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.
    Kim Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2558-68. PubMed ID: 17978654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method.
    Zhong ZC; Wei SH; Wang JP; Feng CK; Chen CS; Yu CH
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jan; 28(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 16426979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ti2448 pedicle screw system augmentation for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang Z; Fu S; Wu ZX; Zhang Y; Lei W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2008-15. PubMed ID: 23921332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
    Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
    Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
    Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.