329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16948241)
1. [MRI-guided biopsy of suspicious abnormalities in the breast].
Meeuwis C; van den Bosch MA; Houwert KA; Fernandez-Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Mali WP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Aug; 150(32):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16948241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique?
Tozaki M; Yamashiro N; Suzuki T; Kawano N; Ozaki S; Sakamoto N; Abe S; Ogawa T; Katayama N; Tsunoda Y; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18807122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions.
Fischer U; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Feb; 9(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 9617901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.
Meeuwis C; Peters NH; Mali WP; Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Schipper ME; van den Bosch MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 17218074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions].
Fischer U; Schwethelm L; Baum FT; Luftner-Nagel S; Teubner J
Rofo; 2009 Aug; 181(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 19582655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions with a handheld vacuum biopsy device.
Gebauer B; Bostanjoglo M; Moesta KT; Schneider W; Schlag PM; Felix R
Acta Radiol; 2006 Nov; 47(9):907-13. PubMed ID: 17077039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI-guided preoperative wire localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Landheer ML; Veltman J; van Eekeren R; Zeillemaker AM; Boetes C; Wobbes T
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 16814136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [New methods for minimal invasive assessment of uncertain mammography and MRI tomography findings].
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Smolny T; Schaumlöffel U; Heinig A; Buchmann J; Lampe D
Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():66-9. PubMed ID: 10063577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experience with hookwire localisation excision biopsy at a medical centre in Malaysia.
Ng CH; Lee KT; Taib NA; Yip CH
Singapore Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 20505908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer.
Bagley FH
Arch Surg; 2004 Apr; 139(4):380-3; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 15078704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging--guided breast interventions.
Eby PR; Lehman CD
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):151-62. PubMed ID: 18941395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art.
O'Flynn EA; Wilson AR; Michell MJ
Clin Radiol; 2010 Apr; 65(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 20338392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effective use of breast biopsy techniques in a Veterans health care system.
Hatmaker AR; Donahue RM; Tarpley JL; Pearson AS
Am J Surg; 2006 Nov; 192(5):e37-41. PubMed ID: 17071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative axillary staging in breast cancer-saving time and resources.
Tahir M; Osman KA; Shabbir J; Rogers C; Suarez R; Reynolds T; Bucknall T
Breast J; 2008; 14(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 18540958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
