These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16949114)

  • 1. A comparison of the population diagnosed with chlamydia in primary care with that diagnosed in sexual health clinics: implications for a national screening programme.
    Cassell JA; Mercer CH; Fenton KA; Copas AJ; Erens B; Wellings K; Johnson AM
    Public Health; 2006 Oct; 120(10):984-8. PubMed ID: 16949114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chlamydia screening in a metropolitan Atlanta primary care clinic.
    Oster NV; Rothenberg R; McPhillips-Tangum CA; Gazmararian J; Franks AL
    South Med J; 2003 Sep; 96(9):863-7. PubMed ID: 14513980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
    Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gonococcal, chlamydia, and syphilis infection positivity among MSM attending a large primary care clinic, Boston, 2003 to 2004.
    Mimiaga MJ; Helms DJ; Reisner SL; Grasso C; Bertrand T; Mosure DJ; Weinstock H; McLean C; Mayer KH
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):507-11. PubMed ID: 19455081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of chlamydia testing in different settings and implications for wider STI diagnosis and care: a probability sample survey of the British population.
    Clifton S; Mercer CH; Woodhall SC; Sonnenberg P; Field N; Lu L; Johnson AM; Cassell JA
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 Jun; 93(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 27979910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Fenton KA; Korovessis C; Johnson AM; McCadden A; McManus S; Wellings K; Mercer CH; Carder C; Copas AJ; Nanchahal K; Macdowall W; Ridgway G; Field J; Erens B
    Lancet; 2001 Dec; 358(9296):1851-4. PubMed ID: 11741624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of risk factors for prevalent sexually transmitted infections based on attendees at two genitourinary medicine clinics in Ireland.
    Shiely F; Hayes K; Horgan M
    Int J STD AIDS; 2014 Jan; 25(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 23970627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
    Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying individuals engaging in risky sexual behaviour for chlamydia infection in the UK: a latent class approach.
    Stuart B; Hinde A
    J Biosoc Sci; 2010 Jan; 42(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 19793405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence of other sexually transmissible infections in patients with newly diagnosed anogenital warts in a sexual health clinic.
    Sturgiss EA; Jin F; Martin SJ; Grulich A; Bowden FJ
    Sex Health; 2010 Mar; 7(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 20152097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring attitudes and practices of General Practice staff towards offers of opportunistic screening for chlamydia: a UK survey.
    Wallace L; McNulty C; Hogan A; Bayley J
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):255-68. PubMed ID: 22781053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a "safe approach" to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm.
    Nielsen A; De Costa A; Danielsson KG; Salazar M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):730. PubMed ID: 29141635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers to opportunistic chlamydia testing in primary care.
    McNulty CA; Freeman E; Bowen J; Shefras J; Fenton KA
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jul; 54(504):508-14. PubMed ID: 15239912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the impact: the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
    Anthonisz M
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Feb 26-Mar 11; 18(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 19462588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing chlamydia positivity in women screened in family planning clinics: do we know why?
    Fine D; Dicker L; Mosure D; Berman S;
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Jan; 35(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17700377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.
    LaMontagne DS; Fenton KA; Randall S; Anderson S; Carter P
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 15459399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opportunistic chlamydia screening; should positive patients be screened for co-infections?
    Harindra V; Tobin JM; Underhill G
    Int J STD AIDS; 2002 Dec; 13(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 12537734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insurance among patients seeking care at a municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic: implications for health care reform in the United States.
    Stephens SC; Cohen SE; Philip SS; Bernstein KT
    Sex Transm Dis; 2014 Apr; 41(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 24622632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's experiences of Chlamydia screening. Qualitative interviews with women in primary care.
    Santer M; Wyke S; Warner P
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 9(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 14611017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.