These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16949114)
21. The management of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary medicine clinics: a national audit in 2004. Challenor R; Pinsent S; Chandramani S; Theobald N; Daniels D Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Jul; 16(7):494-9. PubMed ID: 16004630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sexually transmitted infection testing and screening in hospital-based primary care visits by women. Huppert JS; Goodman E; Khoury J; Slap G Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 15684170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chlamydia trachomatis in Tasmania 2001-2007: rising notification trends. Stephens N; O'Sullivan M; Coleman D; Shaw K Aust N Z J Public Health; 2010 Apr; 34(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 23331353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened. Mills N; Daker-White G; Graham A; Campbell R Fam Pract; 2006 Oct; 23(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 16790452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Countywide survey of the current practice of chlamydia detection in primary care. Shefras J; Edmondson S; McNulty C J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2002 Jul; 28(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 16259834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening? Macleod J; Rowsell R; Horner P; Crowley T; Caul EO; Low N; Smith GD Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Jun; 49(443):455-8. PubMed ID: 10562745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improvement of Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Among HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men Through Implementation of a Standardized Sexual Risk Assessment Tool. Scarborough AP; Slome S; Hurley LB; Park IU Sex Transm Dis; 2015 Oct; 42(10):595-8. PubMed ID: 26372932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Chlamydia diagnosis rate in England in 2012: an ecological study of local authorities. Chandrasekaran L; Davies B; Eaton JW; Ward H Sex Transm Infect; 2017 May; 93(3):226-228. PubMed ID: 27582249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are women with chlamydia infection who self-refer to genitourinary medicine clinics different? Huengsberg M; Ahmed-Jushuf I; Rogstad KE; Jeyasingh N; Paul G; Singh S; Tan B; Lackenby S; Shahmanesh M Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Oct; 16(10):681-5. PubMed ID: 16212716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity. Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Service evaluation of an educational intervention to improve sexual health services in primary care implemented using a step-wedge design: analysis of chlamydia testing and diagnosis rate changes. Town K; McNulty CA; Ricketts EJ; Hartney T; Nardone A; Folkard KA; Charlett A; Dunbar JK BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16():686. PubMed ID: 27484823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Low rates of both asymptomatic chlamydia screening and diagnostic testing of women in US outpatient clinics. Hoover K; Tao G; Kent C Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):891-8. PubMed ID: 18827133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Managing genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in Scotland: targeted opportunistic testing or a screening programme? Clutterbuck DJ Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Nov; 59(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 12661390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. University undergraduates' knowledge of chlamydia screening services and chlamydia infection following the introduction of a National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Greaves A; Lonsdale S; Whinney S; Hood E; Mossop H; Olowokure B Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Feb; 14(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19241303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A pilot qualitative analysis of the psychosocial factors which drive young people to decline chlamydia testing in the UK: implications for health promotion and screening. Richardson D; Maple K; Perry N; Ambler E; Jurd C; Fisher M Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Mar; 21(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 20215623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adult and pediatric emergency department sexually transmitted disease and HIV screening: programmatic overview and outcomes. Mehta SD; Hall J; Lyss SB; Skolnik PR; Pealer LN; Kharasch S Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Mar; 14(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17331918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Opportunistic screening for chlamydia infection in general practice: can we reach young women? Santer M; Warner P; Wyke S; Sutherland S J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):175-6. PubMed ID: 11202582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chlamydia screening in a rural population: access, outcomes and health-care planning. Bendall RP; Keane FE; Barlow MJ; Paynter SJ Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Feb; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 17331278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ; Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Chlamydia testing in contraceptive clinics: who, where, how and why? Bacon L J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2004 Apr; 30(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 15086988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]