These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16949456)

  • 1. Teaching applanation tonometry.
    Castillo BV
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1688.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16949456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation of the biomechanical properties of the cornea by bidirectional applanation: new approaches to interpreting the results].
    Avetisov SE; Novikov IA; Bubnova IA; Antonov AA; Siplivyĭ VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 19062553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New ways to measure intraocular pressure.
    ElMallah MK; Asrani SG
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18301285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual training tool.
    Henderson BA; Neaman A; Kim BH; Loewenstein J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jun; 113(6):1058-9. PubMed ID: 16751045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Noncontact applanation tonometry].
    Stankiewicz A; Krzywicki S
    Klin Oczna; 1982 Mar; 84(3):57-8. PubMed ID: 7176453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The grape: an appropriate model for continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis.
    Figueira EC; Wang LW; Brown TM; Masselos K; Pandya VB; Dauber SL; Lee KJ; Amjadi S; Skalicky SE; Francis IC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1610-1. PubMed ID: 18721730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Use of a manikin for training in measurement of intraocular pressure].
    Novitskiĭ IIa
    Oftalmol Zh; 1981; 36(6):381-2. PubMed ID: 7312283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Table for determination of eye rigidity coefficient by applanation tonometry].
    Akpatrov AI
    Oftalmol Zh; 1981; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 7312281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contact-based stiffness sensing of human eye.
    Kurita Y; Kempf R; Iida Y; Okude J; Kaneko M; Mishima HK; Tsukamoto H; Sugimoto E; Katakura S; Kobayashi K; Kiuchi Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):739-45. PubMed ID: 18270012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teaching and assessing systems-based competency in ophthalmology residency training programs.
    Lee AG; Beaver HA; Greenlee E; Oetting TA; Boldt HC; Olson R; Abramoff M; Carter K
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007; 52(6):680-9. PubMed ID: 18029274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contour tonometer versus goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Erdurmus M; Yagci R
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):471. PubMed ID: 16988614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An improved model for instruction in binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy.
    Bartner H; Paton D
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1971 May; 85(5):530-3. PubMed ID: 5087594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and applanation resonance tonometry in a biomicroscope-based in vitro porcine eye model.
    Hallberg P; Santala K; Lindén C; Lindahl OA; Eklund A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(6):345-52. PubMed ID: 17060162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Hallberg P; Eklund A; Bäcklund T; Lindén C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17224756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative characteristics of current tonometric methods].
    Astakhov IuS; Akopov EL; Potemkin VV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 19062549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using endoscopy to teach cataract surgery.
    Henderson BA; Ali R; Kim JY; Ament CS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1606-10. PubMed ID: 17010854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.