BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16949854)

  • 1. Feasibility of a percutaneous technique for repairing proximal femora with simulated metastatic lesions.
    Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 16949854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
    Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones.
    Heini PF; Franz T; Fankhauser C; Gasser B; Ganz R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jun; 19(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 15182986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength reduction and the effects of treatment of long bones with diaphyseal defects involving 50% of the cortex.
    Leggon RE; Lindsey RW; Panjabi MM
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 3379507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metastatic breast cancer in the femur. A search for the lesion at risk of fracture.
    Keene JS; Sellinger DS; McBeath AA; Engber WD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Feb; (203):282-8. PubMed ID: 3955991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new technique for cement augmentation of the sliding hip screw in proximal femur fractures.
    Stoffel KK; Leys T; Damen N; Nicholls RL; Kuster MS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jan; 23(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17964016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
    Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
    J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lytic lesions in the femoral neck: Importance of location and evaluation of a novel minimally invasive repair technique.
    Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 18327790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elastomer femoroplasty prevents hip fracture displacement In vitro biomechanical study comparing two minimal invasive femoroplasty techniques.
    van der Steenhoven TJ; Schaasberg W; de Vries AC; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):464-9. PubMed ID: 21255888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential.
    Beckmann J; Ferguson SJ; Gebauer M; Luering C; Gasser B; Heini P
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):755-64. PubMed ID: 17023189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The treatment of metastasis to the femoral neck using percutaneous hollow perforated screws with cement augmentation.
    Kang HG; Roh YW; Kim HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1078-82. PubMed ID: 19651838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures.
    de Bakker PM; Manske SL; Ebacher V; Oxland TR; Cripton PA; Guy P
    J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(12):1917-25. PubMed ID: 19524929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts.
    Derikx LC; van Aken JB; Janssen D; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 22844058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
    Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of percutaneous cementoplasty combined with interventional internal fixation for impending pathologic fracture of the proximal femur.
    He C; Tian Q; Wu CG; Gu Y; Wang T; Li M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1112-7. PubMed ID: 24801501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous femoroplasty for the treatment of proximal femoral metastases.
    Feng H; Feng J; Li Z; Feng Q; Zhang Q; Qin D; Chen W; Li Z; Zhang Y
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 24411706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures.
    Sivasundaram R; Shah S; Ahmadi S; Wunder JS; Schemitsch EH; Ferguson PC; Zdero R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):e174-80. PubMed ID: 23249892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.
    Aminian A; Gao F; Fedoriw WW; Zhang LQ; Kalainov DM; Merk BR
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):544-8. PubMed ID: 17805021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The strength of metal reinforced methylmethacrylate fixation of pathologic fractures.
    Wang GJ; Reger SI; Maffeo C; McLaughlin RE; Stamp WG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1978 Sep; (135):287-90. PubMed ID: 709941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case.
    Lee T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 35(4):642-50. PubMed ID: 17286207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.