These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16950102)

  • 1. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.
    Qvarnström A; Brommer JE; Gustafsson L
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):84-6. PubMed ID: 16672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition.
    Johnstone RA
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):172-5. PubMed ID: 7969449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ornament evolution in dragon lizards: multiple gains and widespread losses reveal a complex history of evolutionary change.
    Ord TJ; Stuart-Fox D
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):797-808. PubMed ID: 16674576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
    Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies.
    David P; Bjorksten T; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6792):186-8. PubMed ID: 10910358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism.
    Brooks R
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):343-58. PubMed ID: 12555789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 15278842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolutionary dynamics of a sexual ornament in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): the role of indirect selection within and between sexes.
    Jensen H; Steinsland I; Ringsby TH; Saether BE
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1275-93. PubMed ID: 18384654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed.
    Kokko H; Mappes J
    Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1876-85. PubMed ID: 16261726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uninformative exaggeration of male sexual ornaments in barn swallows.
    Bro-Jørgensen J; Johnstone RA; Evans MR
    Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 17412591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection.
    Wade MJ; Shuster SM; Demuth JP
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 14582004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.