BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

785 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16950630)

  • 1. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.
    Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Caes F; Van Overbeke H; Van Nooten G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 30(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 16950630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement.
    Thomson HL; O'Brien MF; Almeida AA; Tesar PJ; Davison MB; Burstow DJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 May; 13(5):572-5. PubMed ID: 9663541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Dunning J; Graham RJ; Thambyrajah J; Stewart MJ; Kendall SW; Hunter S
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Oct; 28(19):2369-74. PubMed ID: 17670757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenograft achieves superior regression of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to pericardial stented aortic valves.
    Tavakoli R; Auf der Maur C; Mueller X; Schläpfer R; Jamshidi P; Daubeuf F; Frossard N
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 25643748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stented bioprosthetic valve hemodynamics: is the supra-annular implant better than the intra-annular?
    Badano LP; Pavoni D; Musumeci S; Frassani R; Gianfagna P; Baldassi M; Tursi V; Mazzaro E; Zakja E; Fioretti PM; Livi U
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 16607907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.
    Borger MA; Carson SM; Ivanov J; Rao V; Scully HE; Feindel CM; David TE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.
    Tavakoli R; Danial P; Oudjana AH; Jamshidi P; Gassmann M; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 May; 66(5):247-256. PubMed ID: 29322433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left ventricular mass regression is independent of gradient drop and effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis.
    Sádaba JR; Herregods MC; Bogaert J; Harringer W; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 23409363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with CryoLife-O'Brien stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Gelsomino S; Frassani R; Morocutti G; Porreca L; Tursi V; Masullo G; Lumini R; Livi U
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Sep; 10(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 11603600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement: left ventricular mass regression.
    Tamim M; Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Taeymans Y; Van Nooten GJ
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2005 Jun; 13(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 15905337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective randomized evaluation of stentless vs. stented aortic biologic prosthetic valves in the elderly at five years.
    Risteski PS; Martens S; Rouhollahpour A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Moritz A; Doss M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 8(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 19126556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.
    Jin XY; Zhang ZM; Gibson DG; Yacoub MH; Pepper JR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Sep; 62(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 8783993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
    Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stentless or stented aortic valve implants in elderly patients?
    Van Nooten G; Caes F; François K; Van Belleghem Y; Taeymans Y
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 15(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10077370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement.
    Tasca G; Brunelli F; Cirillo M; DallaTomba M; Mhagna Z; Troise G; Quaini E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 79(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 15680824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-prosthesis mismatch and left ventricular remodelling after implantation of Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic valve prostheses.
    Germing A; Lindstaedt M; Holt S; Reber D; Mügge A; Laczkovics A; Fritz M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Aug; 49(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 18665119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consideration of prosthesis-patient mismatch and left ventricular mass regression after implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in elderly Japanese patients: body surface area may be irrelevant.
    Takai H; Yamachika S; Hazama S; Ariyoshi T; Odate T; Matsukuma S; Yanatori M; Onohara D; Eishi K
    J Artif Organs; 2004; 7(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 15739053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Freedom SOLO valve for aortic valve replacement: clinical and hemodynamic results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Beholz S; Repossini A; Livi U; Schepens M; El Gabry M; Matschke K; Trivedi U; Eckel L; Dapunt O; Zamorano JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jan; 19(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20329497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of valve prosthesis type on the recovery of ventricular dysfunction and subendocardial ischaemia following valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Collinson J; Flather M; Coats AJ; Pepper JR; Henein M
    Int J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 97(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 15561345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.