These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16950722)

  • 1. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance.
    Venetjoki N; Kaarlela-Tuomaala A; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Ergonomics; 2006 Sep; 49(11):1068-91. PubMed ID: 16950722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types--a laboratory experiment.
    Haka M; Haapakangas A; Keränen J; Hakala J; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2009 Dec; 19(6):454-67. PubMed ID: 19702627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance.
    Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2005 Dec; 15(6):458-68. PubMed ID: 16268835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Thaden R; Vorländer M
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):719-36. PubMed ID: 18432448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open-plan office noise: the susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech.
    Jahncke H
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):315-20. PubMed ID: 23257585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices - longitudinal study during relocation.
    Kaarlela-Tuomaala A; Helenius R; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1423-44. PubMed ID: 19851909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined effects of acoustic and visual distraction on cognitive performance and well-being.
    Liebl A; Haller J; Jödicke B; Baumgartner H; Schlittmeier S; Hellbrück J
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 21802069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.
    Klatte M; Lachmann T; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):270-82. PubMed ID: 20871182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech signal modification to increase intelligibility in noisy environments.
    Yoo SD; Boston JR; El-Jaroudi A; Li CC; Durrant JD; Kovacyk K; Shaiman S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1138-49. PubMed ID: 17672660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of speech on proofreading: can task-engagement manipulations shield against distraction?
    Halin N; Marsh JE; Haga A; Holmgren M; Sörqvist P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Mar; 20(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 24099531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effect of time-compressed speech on the perception of ataxic dysarthria: a report of two cases].
    Woisard-Bassols V; Espesser R; Ghio A; Nguyen N; Duez D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2010; 62(4):185-94. PubMed ID: 20460931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.