These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16950729)

  • 1. The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication.
    Schapira MM; Nattinger AB; McAuliffe TL
    J Health Commun; 2006 Sep; 11(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 16950729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency format diagram and probability chart for breast cancer risk communication: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Ghosh K; Crawford BJ; Pruthi S; Williams CI; Neal L; Sandhu NP; Johnson RE; Wahner-Roedler D; Britain MK; Cha SS; Ghosh AK
    BMC Womens Health; 2008 Oct; 8():18. PubMed ID: 18937844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating breast cancer risks to women using different formats.
    Lipkus IM; Klein WM; Rimer BK
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Aug; 10(8):895-8. PubMed ID: 11489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informing women about their breast cancer risks: truth and consequences.
    Lipkus IM; Biradavolu M; Fenn K; Keller P; Rimer BK
    Health Commun; 2001; 13(2):205-26. PubMed ID: 11451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement between scales in the measurement of breast cancer risk perceptions.
    Schapira MM; Davids SL; McAuliffe TL; Nattinger AB
    Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):665-73. PubMed ID: 15209937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health literacy and cancer risk perception: implications for genomic risk communication.
    Brewer NT; Tzeng JP; Lillie SE; Edwards AS; Peppercorn JM; Rimer BK
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 19050227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer prevention: patient decision making and risk communication in the high risk setting.
    Ozanne EM; Wittenberg E; Garber JE; Weeks JC
    Breast J; 2010; 16(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 19889168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer risk elements and nurse practitioners' knowledge, use, and perceived comfort level of breast cancer risk assessment.
    Edwards QT; Maradiegue A; Seibert D; Saunders-Goldson S; Humphreys S
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2009 May; 21(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 19432911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey.
    Fagerlin A; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Jun; 57(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 15893211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Watson M; Lloyd S; Davidson J; Meyer L; Eeles R; Ebbs S; Murday V
    Br J Cancer; 1999 Feb; 79(5-6):868-74. PubMed ID: 10070883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. It won't happen to me: lower perception of heart disease risk among women with family histories of breast cancer.
    Erblich J; Bovbjerg DH; Norman C; Valdimarsdottir HB; Montgomery GH
    Prev Med; 2000 Dec; 31(6):714-21. PubMed ID: 11133339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.
    Rodriguez KL; Appelt CJ; Switzer GE; Sonel AF; Arnold RM
    Heart Lung; 2008; 37(6):440-8. PubMed ID: 18992627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of new multimedia formats for cancer communications.
    Bader JL; Strickman-Stein N
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e16. PubMed ID: 14517107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing perceptions of cancer risk: does mode of assessment or numeracy matter?
    Kelly KM; Graves KD; Harper FW; Schmidt JE; Dickinson SL; Andrykowski MA
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2007; 31(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 18061368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer survivors' attitudes about communication of breast cancer risk to their children.
    Miesfeldt S; Cohn WF; Jones SM; Ropka ME; Weinstein JC
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2003 May; 119C(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12704637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2.
    Gurmankin AD; Domchek S; Stopfer J; Fels C; Armstrong K
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Mar; 165(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 15767527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.