535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16951929)
1. Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT.
Schmidt GP; Schoenberg SO; Schmid R; Stahl R; Tiling R; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Baur-Melnyk A
Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):939-49. PubMed ID: 16951929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Herzog P; Schmid R; Tiling R; Schmidt M; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2005 Dec; 40(12):743-53. PubMed ID: 16304476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of high resolution whole-body MRI using parallel imaging and PET-CT. First experiences with a 32-channel MRI system].
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Tiling R; Hahn K; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Radiologe; 2004 Sep; 44(9):889-98. PubMed ID: 15349732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-body MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T compared with FDG-PET-CT for the detection of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Haug A; Utzschneider S; Becker CR; Tiling R; Reiser MF; Hermann KA
Eur Radiol; 2009 Jun; 19(6):1366-78. PubMed ID: 19190917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective observational study on diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI in solid small round cell tumours.
Kembhavi SA; Rangarajan V; Shah S; Qureshi S; Arora B; Juvekar S; Laskar S; Vora T; Chinnaswamy G; Ramadwar M; Kurkure P
Clin Radiol; 2014 Sep; 69(9):900-8. PubMed ID: 24863003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Value of Whole-Body DWI With Background Body Suppression Plus Calculation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3 T Versus
Sun W; Li M; Gu Y; Sun Z; Qiu Z; Zhou Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):446-454. PubMed ID: 31799866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Haug A; Heinemann V; Bauerfeind I; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 18082989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supplemental value of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) technique to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in detection of bone metastases from thyroid cancer.
Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Iwano S; Ito S; Ogawa H; Naganawa S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 23721138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the extent of metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors using whole-body PET, CT, MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Seemann MD; Meisetschlaeger G; Gaa J; Rummeny EJ
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Feb; 11(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 16504962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-body three-dimensional short tau inversion recovery and T1-weighted in/opposed phase MRI in the detection of neuroblastoma bone marrow metastasis: comparative study with PET/CT utilising bone marrow biopsy as the reference standard.
Soliman H; El-Noueam K; Ettaby A; Fadel S; Abougabal AM
Clin Radiol; 2023 Jul; 78(7):e535-e541. PubMed ID: 36997373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-body MRI, FDG-PET/CT, and bone marrow biopsy, for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Albano D; Patti C; Lagalla R; Midiri M; Galia M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 27603267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of colon cancer: whole-body MRI vs. whole-body PET-CT--initial clinical experience.
Squillaci E; Manenti G; Mancino S; Cicciò C; Calabria F; Danieli R; Schillaci O; Simonetti G
Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(6):676-88. PubMed ID: 18373114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-body [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in the assessment of bone lesions in oncological patients: initial results.
Beiderwellen K; Huebner M; Heusch P; Grueneisen J; Ruhlmann V; Nensa F; Kuehl H; Umutlu L; Rosenbaum-Krumme S; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2014 Aug; 24(8):2023-30. PubMed ID: 24907940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
