BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16952337)

  • 1. Identification and characterization of somatosensory off responses.
    Spackman L; Boyd S; Towell T
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16952337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulation of the rat somatosensory cortex at different frequencies and pulse widths.
    Van Camp N; Verhoye M; Van der Linden A
    NMR Biomed; 2006 Feb; 19(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 16408324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interaction between somatosensory and auditory cognitive processing assessed with event-related potentials.
    Touge T; Gonzalez D; Wu J; Deguchi K; Tsukaguchi M; Shimamura M; Ikeda K; Kuriyama S
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 18340272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regularity increases middle latency evoked and late induced beta brain response following proprioceptive stimulation.
    Arnfred SM; Hansen LK; Parnas J; Mørup M
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():114-31. PubMed ID: 18514635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Valeriani M; Leggio MG; Molinari M
    Brain; 2007 Jan; 130(Pt 1):276-87. PubMed ID: 16982654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nerve specific modulation of somatosensory inflow to cerebral cortex during submaximal sustained contraction in first dorsal interosseous muscle.
    Nakajima T; Endoh T; Sakamoto M; Komiyama T
    Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 1053(1-2):146-53. PubMed ID: 16026769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evoked response amplitudes from somatosensory cortices do not determine reaction times to tactile stimuli.
    Ploner M; Platzen J; Pollok B; Gross J; Schnitzler A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3734-41. PubMed ID: 17610593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New depth short-latency somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) component recorded in human SI area.
    Barba C; Valeriani M; Colicchio G; Mauguière F
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Feb; 432(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 18226449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear interactions of high-frequency oscillations in the human somatosensory system.
    Jaros U; Hilgenfeld B; Lau S; Curio G; Haueisen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2647-57. PubMed ID: 18829382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-relevant modulation of contralateral and ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex and the role of a prefrontal-cortical sensory gating system.
    Staines WR; Graham SJ; Black SE; McIlroy WE
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 11771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploratory event-related potential study of multisensory integration in sensory over-responsive children.
    Brett-Green BA; Miller LJ; Schoen SA; Nielsen DM
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1321():67-77. PubMed ID: 20097181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 19070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-frequency somatosensory evoked potentials of normal subjects.
    Lin CY; Yeh YC; Lai KL; Chen JT; Wang SJ; Lin YY; Liao KK
    Acta Neurol Taiwan; 2009 Sep; 18(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 19960961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention related SEP amplitude modulations covary with BOLD signal in S1--a simultaneous EEG--fMRI study.
    Schubert R; Ritter P; Wüstenberg T; Preuschhof C; Curio G; Sommer W; Villringer A
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2686-700. PubMed ID: 18372293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Movement-related changes in cortical excitability: a steady-state SEP approach.
    Kourtis D; Seiss E; Praamstra P
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1244():113-20. PubMed ID: 18845129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP.
    Nakata H; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 22(7):1784-92. PubMed ID: 16197519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Somatosensory evoked potentials following tactile skin stimulation].
    Claus D; Linsenmeier R; Sturm U; Engelhardt A
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1987 Sep; 18(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 3115752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism.
    Sokhadze E; Baruth J; Tasman A; Sears L; Mathai G; El-Baz A; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Mar; 34(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 19199028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatiotemporal properties modulate intermodal influences on early somatosensory processing during sensory-guided movement.
    Meehan SK; Legon W; Staines WR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 120(7):1371-80. PubMed ID: 19501547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.