283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16952719)
1. What do you do when you have a loose screw?
Brady PC; Arrigoni P; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2006 Sep; 22(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 16952719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors.
Leedle BP; Miller MD
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15650671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
Richards DP; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jul; 21(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16012500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of tibial eminence fracture fixation with high-strength suture, EndoButton, and suture anchor.
Hapa O; Barber FA; Süner G; Özden R; Davul S; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 22284410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Hapa O; Rapley JH; Barber CA; Bynum JA; Hrnack SA
Arthroscopy; 2011 Jul; 27(7):895-905. PubMed ID: 21693345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security.
Lo IK; Burkhart SS; Chan KC; Athanasiou K
Arthroscopy; 2004 May; 20(5):489-502. PubMed ID: 15122139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of suture anchors in the acetabular rim.
Ruiz-Suarez M; Aziz-Jacobo J; Barber FA
Arthroscopy; 2010 Jun; 26(6):762-8. PubMed ID: 20511034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation of tendon grafts for collateral ligament reconstructions: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
Lee SK; Kubiak EN; Liporace FA; Parisi DM; Iesaka K; Posner MA
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Sep; 30(5):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16182066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strength of single- versus double-anchor repair of type II SLAP lesions: a cadaveric study.
Baldini T; Snyder RL; Peacher G; Bach J; McCarty E
Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1257-60. PubMed ID: 19896047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Beavis RC; Barrera Oro F
Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):859-67. PubMed ID: 18657733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Coons DA; Boothby MH
Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1063.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17027403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure.
Morgan RJ; Kuremsky MA; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 18375268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The properties of damaged and undamaged suture used in metal and bioabsorbable anchors: an in vitro study.
Wright PB; Budoff JE; Yeh ML; Kelm ZS; Luo ZP
Arthroscopy; 2007 Jun; 23(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 17560481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
