186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16952836)
1. Classification of intramural metastases and lymph node metastases of esophageal cancer from gene expression based on boosting and projective adaptive resonance theory.
Takahashi H; Aoyagi K; Nakanishi Y; Sasaki H; Yoshida T; Honda H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2006 Jul; 102(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16952836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
Huang DS; Zheng CH
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structured polychotomous machine diagnosis of multiple cancer types using gene expression.
Koo JY; Sohn I; Kim S; Lee JW
Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 16452113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FM-test: a fuzzy-set-theory-based approach to differential gene expression data analysis.
Liang LR; Lu S; Wang X; Lu Y; Mandal V; Patacsil D; Kumar D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S7. PubMed ID: 17217525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A combination of rough-based feature selection and RBF neural network for classification using gene expression data.
Chiang JH; Ho SH
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Mar; 7(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18334459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
Cawley GC; Talbot NL
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large scale data mining approach for gene-specific standardization of microarray gene expression data.
Yoon S; Yang Y; Choi J; Seong J
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2898-904. PubMed ID: 17032674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
Niijima S; Kuhara S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microarray-based classification and clinical predictors: on combined classifiers and additional predictive value.
Boulesteix AL; Porzelius C; Daumer M
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1698-706. PubMed ID: 18544547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene selection via the BAHSIC family of algorithms.
Song L; Bedo J; Borgwardt KM; Gretton A; Smola A
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i490-8. PubMed ID: 17646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Algebraic stability indicators for ranked lists in molecular profiling.
Jurman G; Merler S; Barla A; Paoli S; Galea A; Furlanello C
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 18024475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An integrated algorithm for gene selection and classification applied to microarray data of ovarian cancer.
Lee ZJ
Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 18006289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
Gui J; Li H
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules.
Wang D; Lv Y; Guo Z; Li X; Li Y; Zhu J; Yang D; Xu J; Wang C; Rao S; Yang B
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2883-9. PubMed ID: 16809389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Annotation-based distance measures for patient subgroup discovery in clinical microarray studies.
Lottaz C; Toedling J; Spang R
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2256-64. PubMed ID: 17586546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dependence network modeling for biomarker identification.
Qiu P; Wang ZJ; Liu KJ; Hu ZZ; Wu CH
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 17077095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Right- and left-sided colorectal cancers display distinct expression profiles and the anatomical stratification allows a high accuracy prediction of lymph node metastasis.
Komuro K; Tada M; Tamoto E; Kawakami A; Matsunaga A; Teramoto K; Shindoh G; Takada M; Murakawa K; Kanai M; Kobayashi N; Fujiwara Y; Nishimura N; Hamada J; Ishizu A; Ikeda H; Kondo S; Katoh H; Moriuchi T; Yoshiki T
J Surg Res; 2005 Apr; 124(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 15820251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of gene expression data: a predictor-based approach.
Fishel I; Kaufman A; Ruppin E
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1599-606. PubMed ID: 17463023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting survival from microarray data--a comparative study.
Bøvelstad HM; Nygård S; Størvold HL; Aldrin M; Borgan Ø; Frigessi A; Lingjaerde OC
Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2080-7. PubMed ID: 17553857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data.
Xu L; Tan AC; Naiman DQ; Geman D; Winslow RL
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3905-11. PubMed ID: 16131522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
