112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953039)
1. Dual-energy mammography: simulation studies.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Pallikarakis N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(18):4497-515. PubMed ID: 16953039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis.
Lemacks MR; Kappadath SC; Shaw CC; Liu X; Whitman GJ
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1739-51. PubMed ID: 12201421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
Chen B; Ning R
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].
Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1052-6. PubMed ID: 11199434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.
Koukou V; Martini N; Michail C; Sotiropoulou P; Fountzoula C; Kalyvas N; Kandarakis I; Nikiforidis G; Fountos G
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():574238. PubMed ID: 26246848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography].
Horino K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the feasibility of classifying breast microcalcifications using photon-counting spectral mammography: A simulation study.
Ghammraoui B; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2304-2311. PubMed ID: 28332199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An adaptive algorithm for the detection of microcalcifications in simulated low-dose mammography.
Treiber O; Wanninger F; Führ H; Panzer W; Regulla D; Winkler G
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 12630741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of mammographic lesions.
Saunders R; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):860-70. PubMed ID: 16777560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the effect of silicone breast inserts on X-ray mammography and breast tomosynthesis images: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Daskalaki A; Bliznakova K; Pallikarakis N
Phys Med; 2016 Feb; 32(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 26818470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of anatomical noise on optimal beam quality in mammography.
Cederström B; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121903. PubMed ID: 25471963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Color mammography. Image generation and receiver operating characteristic evaluation.
Boone JM
Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 1860758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.
Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.
Ding H; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):4719-38. PubMed ID: 22771941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
