487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953347)
1. Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Wirth CJ; Gossé F
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Sep; 18(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 16953347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Surface-replacement total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of the femoral head osteonecrosis].
Yu Z; Wang LM; Gui JC; Wu JX; Jiang CZ; Xu Y
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Jan; 21(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 19102270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach.
Oinuma K; Eingartner C; Saito Y; Shiratsuchi H
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Aug; 19(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 17728988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach].
Gravius S; Mumme T; Weber O; Berdel P; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2009 Dec; 21(6):586-601. PubMed ID: 20087719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Shim P; Banga K
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):127-31. PubMed ID: 19553070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
Fink B; Grossmann A
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of modular large femoral heads without liners in hip arthroplasty.
Seyler TM; Etienne G; Plate JF; Fisher P; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():217-20. PubMed ID: 17029179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.
Su EP; Sheehan M; Su SL
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 19056234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of avascular necrosis of femoral head in young and middle-aged patients].
Dong T; Sun J; Qu Y; Wang Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 19(9):707-9. PubMed ID: 16206757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Campbell P; Shim P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():148-52. PubMed ID: 17016225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair.
Hummel MT; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Baker DL
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):73-6. PubMed ID: 19577890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted vs conventional mechanical jig technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Resubal JR; Morgan DA
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 18534413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.
Bailey C; Gul R; Falworth M; Zadow S; Oakeshott R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 18972176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
