These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953480)

  • 1. [Radiation exposure with 3D rotational angiography of the skull].
    Gosch D; Kurze W; Deckert F; Schulz T; Patz A; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Sep; 178(9):880-5. PubMed ID: 16953480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose comparison of classical 2-plane DSA and 3D rotational angiography for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms.
    Guberina N; Lechel U; Forsting M; Mönninghoff C; Dietrich U; Ringelstein A
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Jul; 58(7):673-8. PubMed ID: 26970990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation Dose from 3D Rotational vs. Conventional 2D Digital Subtraction Angiography in Intracranial Aneurysm Coiling.
    Tonkopi E; Al-Habsi AH; Shankar JJ
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2015 May; 42(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 25857349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Schueler BA; Kallmes DF; Cloft HJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 Sep; 26(8):1898-901. PubMed ID: 16155131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology.
    Struffert T; Hauer M; Banckwitz R; Köhler C; Royalty K; Doerfler A
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1257-65. PubMed ID: 24691631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation Dosimetry of 3D Rotational Neuroangiography and 2D-DSA in Children.
    Shkumat NA; Shroff MM; Muthusami P
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 29496725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional rotation venography using the digital subtraction angiography unit with a flat-panel detector: usefulness for the transtemporal/transtentorial approaches.
    Nishio A; Takami T; Ohata K; Hara M; Mitsuhashi Y; Yokote H; Inoue Y; Hosogai M; Ichida T; Ikeda S
    Neuroradiology; 2004 Nov; 46(11):876-82. PubMed ID: 15502998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pancreas allografts: comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with standard digital subtraction angiography.
    Bozlar U; Brayman KL; Hagspiel KD
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2 Pt 1):239-44. PubMed ID: 18341956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience.
    Hatakeyama Y; Kakeda S; Korogi Y; Ohnari N; Moriya J; Oda N; Nishino K; Miyamoto W
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):2594-602. PubMed ID: 16708219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical techniques for reducing radiation exposure during cerebral angiography procedures.
    Pearl MS; Torok C; Wang J; Wyse E; Mahesh M; Gailloud P
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2015 Feb; 7(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 24489125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient dose from 3D rotational neurovascular studies.
    Bridcut RR; Murphy E; Workman A; Flynn P; Winder RJ
    Br J Radiol; 2007 May; 80(953):362-6. PubMed ID: 17202197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frameless neuronavigation based only on 3D digital subtraction angiography using surface-based facial registration.
    Stidd DA; Wewel J; Ghods AJ; Munich S; Serici A; Keigher KM; Theessen H; Moftakhar R; Lopes DK
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 121(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 25036204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems.
    Suzuki S; Yamaguchi I; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Masumoto T; Ozaki Y
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Apr; 34(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 20495804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiation exposure during angiography of the arteries supplying the brain. A comparison between intra-arterial DSA and the conventional technique].
    Gilgenbach R; Schröder U; Heuser L
    Rofo; 1990 Oct; 153(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 2171089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of patient dose in two-dimensional carotid arteriography and three-dimensional rotational angiography.
    Tsapaki V; Vano E; Muavrikou I; Nueofotistou V; Gallego JJ; Fernandez JM; Santos E; Mendez J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 17952503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation exposure to operating staff during rotational flat-panel angiography and C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CT) applications.
    Schulz B; Heidenreich R; Heidenreich M; Eichler K; Thalhammer A; Naeem NN; Vogl TJ; Zangos S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4138-42. PubMed ID: 22304981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of the liver transplants.
    Housseini AM; Bozlar U; Schmitt TM; Bonatti H; Arslan B; Turba UC; Khalil TH; Hagspiel KD
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 19237052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between the contrast effects of raw data projection images from three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography and the optimal volume rendering parameters.
    Takagi S; Tokumitsu H; Sanada S
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 25447419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 2D driven 3D vessel segmentation algorithm for 3D digital subtraction angiography data.
    Spiegel M; Redel T; Struffert T; Hornegger J; Doerfler A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6401-19. PubMed ID: 21908904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.
    Hatakeyama Y; Kakeda S; Ohnari N; Moriya J; Oda N; Nishino K; Miyamoto W; Korogi Y
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 17416814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.