These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953547)

  • 21. [The editorial process].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Nov; 170(48):3933. PubMed ID: 19087728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Big and small research fraud].
    Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [It smells!].
    Bundgaard S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 12553101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [It smells! 2].
    Engberg M; Christensen B; Karlsmose B; Lauritzen T; Lous J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(11):1148-9. PubMed ID: 12677997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Online submission of manuscripts for "The Orthopedist."].
    Orthopade; 2012 Oct; 41(10):799. PubMed ID: 23052845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Is Tidsskriftet's publishing time too long?].
    Sellevold OF; Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jun; 130(12):1228-31. PubMed ID: 20567273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The peer review process III: when the decision is made.
    Riss P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Why was my article refused?].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Jan; 171(5):303. PubMed ID: 19176154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opening up peer review.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 17199123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Two years experience with the editorial. Manager successful implementation for "Der Ophthalmologe"].
    Holz FG
    Ophthalmologe; 2009 Jan; 106(1):5. PubMed ID: 19083003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changed times at Hematological Oncology.
    Hall PA
    Hematol Oncol; 2006 Mar; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16498572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Assessment of articles in the Ugeskrift for Laeger by the national health research committee].
    Nielsen GD
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(40):3840; author reply 3840. PubMed ID: 14560512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ["Heredity and cancer"--a special feature issue with problems].
    Nørby S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug; 168(33):2689; author reply 2690. PubMed ID: 16953549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On editorial practice and peer review.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fair and fast reviews.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2004 Nov; 14(9):1175-6. PubMed ID: 15448293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication.
    Williams HC
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15243528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Conflict of interest information--more stringent rules in the Ugeskrift].
    Schroeder TV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(46):3986. PubMed ID: 17125650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Manuscript guidelines].
    Kramp P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Mar; 166(12):1131; author reply 1131. PubMed ID: 15067778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.