These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953704)

  • 21. Information-theoretic latent distribution modeling: distinguishing discrete and continuous latent variable models.
    Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):228-43. PubMed ID: 16953702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.
    Braeken J; Tuerlinckx F
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19897820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
    Revuelta J; Kessel D
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A note on monotone likelihood ratio of the total score variable in unidimensional item response theory.
    Unlü A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17535477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. IRT-related factor analytic procedures for testing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and Internet-administered questionnaires.
    Ferrando PJ; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 15998177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple imputation for item scores when test data are factorially complex.
    van Ginkel JR; van der Ark LA; Sijtsma K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):315-37. PubMed ID: 17971272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multicomponent latent trait models for complex tasks.
    Embretson SE; Yang X
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 16807498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Item response theory analysis of diagnostic criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: implications for DSM-V.
    Martin CS; Chung T; Kirisci L; Langenbucher JW
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2006 Nov; 115(4):807-14. PubMed ID: 17100538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The multilevel latent covariate model: a new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies.
    Lüdtke O; Marsh HW; Robitzsch A; Trautwein U; Asparouhov T; Muthén B
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):203-29. PubMed ID: 18778152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with mixed exponential family and ordered categorical data.
    Lee SY; Tang NS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):151-72. PubMed ID: 16709284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Examining Nonnormal Latent Variable Distributions for Non-Ignorable Missing Data.
    Liu CW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):159-177. PubMed ID: 33958834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.
    Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
    Steinberg L; Thissen D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examining the Robustness of the Graded Response and 2-Parameter Logistic Models to Violations of Construct Normality.
    Manapat PD; Edwards MC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):967-988. PubMed ID: 35989729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attitudes, order and quantity: deterministic and direct probabilistic tests of unidimensional unfolding.
    Kyngdon A; Richards B
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 17215563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Item response theory and the measurement of clinical change.
    Reise SP; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Jun; 84(3):228-38. PubMed ID: 15907159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.