These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953707)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.
    Rodriguez MC; Maeda Y
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 16953707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 18778150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients.
    Botella J; Suero M; Gambara H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):386-97. PubMed ID: 20853953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
    Le H; Schmidt FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):416-38. PubMed ID: 17154755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):368-85. PubMed ID: 20853952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.
    Schmidt FL; Raju NS
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 17371079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.
    Rae G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):515-25. PubMed ID: 19017437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.
    Hunter JE; Schmidt FL; Le H
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):594-612. PubMed ID: 16737357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis.
    Hedges LV; Pigott TD
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Sep; 6(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 11570228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data.
    Furlow CF; Beretvas SN
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):227-54. PubMed ID: 15998179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choosing the best method for local validity estimation: relative accuracy of meta-analysis versus a local study versus Bayes-analysis.
    Newman DA; Jacobs RR; Bartram D
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1394-413. PubMed ID: 17845093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alpha if item deleted: a note on loss of criterion validity in scale development if maximizing coefficient alpha.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):275-85. PubMed ID: 17535482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Coefficients of feasibility for ordinal response scales].
    Elosua Oliden P; Zumbo BD
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):896-901. PubMed ID: 18940100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthesizer 1.0: a varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.
    Krizan Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 20805608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A reliability generalization study of coefficient alpha for the life orientation test.
    Vassar M; Bradley G
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Jul; 92(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 20552511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):182-202. PubMed ID: 18778151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studying group and time invariance in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments via covariance structure modelling.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):301-17. PubMed ID: 16293202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of three sensitivity measures in magnitude estimation tasks].
    Villarino Vivas A; Reales Avilés JM; Fontes de Gracia AI; Fontes de Gracia S
    Psicothema; 2008 May; 20(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 18413099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the statistical significance of relative weights.
    Tonidandel S; Lebreton JM; Johnson JW
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Dec; 14(4):387-99. PubMed ID: 19968399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.