756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953709)
1. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading disappearing text.
Rayner K; Yang J; Castelhano MS; Liversedge SP
Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 21142374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.
Ashby J; Rayner K; Clifton C
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1065-86. PubMed ID: 16194948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2009 Sep; 24(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 19739933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements.
Rayner K; Cook AE; Juhasz BJ; Frazier L
Br J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 97(Pt 4):467-82. PubMed ID: 17018184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading.
Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Jacobs AM; Wimmer H
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):637-48. PubMed ID: 16115655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning new word meanings from context: a study of eye movements.
Chaffin R; Morris RK; Seely RE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):225-35. PubMed ID: 11204099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns.
Hautala J; Hyönä J; Aro M
Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1719-27. PubMed ID: 21664920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.
Allen PA; Bucur B; Grabbe J; Work T; Madden DJ
Exp Aging Res; 2011 May; 37(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 21534029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
Kennedy A; Pynte J
Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
Pynte J; Kennedy A
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
